Meras Engineering Inc. et al v. Ch2O. Inc.

Filing 46

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 45 DISMISSAL filed by Chad Walrod, Meras Engineering Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/20/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2013)

Download PDF
1 DAWN M. ROSS (SBN 143028) KIMBERLY CORCORAN (148229) 2 CARLE, MACKIE, POWER & ROSS LLP 100 B Street, Suite 400 3 Santa Rosa, California 95401 Telephone: (707) 526-4200 4 Facsimile: (707) 526-4707 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MERAS ENGINEERING INC., a California Corporation, and CHAD WALROD, 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 CH2O, Inc., a Washington Corporation, 14 Defendant(s) 15 Case No. C12-02738 EMC (1) STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL (FRCP 10(a)) and (2) [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL Complaint Filed: 05/29/2012 Honorable Edward M. Chen 16 I. 17 STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL Plaintiffs Meras Engineering and Chad Walrod (herein “Plaintiffs”), on the one hand, and 18 19 Defendant CH2O Inc. (“herein Defendant”), on the other hand, hereby stipulate as follows: 20 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed the complaint in this action on May 29, 2012 (docket 1); and 21 WHEREAS, Defendant filed an answer to the complaint on July 12, 2012 (docket 14); 22 and 23 WHEREAS, on January 14, 2013, the Court issued an order in a Related Case, Meras 24 Engineering Inc., et al. v. CH2O, Inc., et al., Case number C 3:11-00389 EMC (docket 87 in case 25 C 3:11-00389 EMC), by which that Related Case was dismissed on the basis of a contractual 26 choice of venue clause; 27 WHEREAS, the parties to this case reviewed the contractual language at issue in this 28 case and determined that it was sufficiently similar that the court may dismiss this action as well CARLE, MACKIE, POWER & ROSS LLP 00286258.DOC 1 Stipulation Re: Dismissal and [Proposed] Order Of Dismissal Case No.: C12-02738 EMC 1 on the basis of contractual venue, even though the parties still dispute the enforceability of the 2 subject venue clause; 3 WHEREAS, there is already an action pending between CH2O, Inc. and Chad Walrod in 4 the Washington State courts on issues that are similar to those presented by this case; and 5 WHEREAS, the parties to this case have entered into an agreement by which they 6 mutually waive fees and costs related to this action in contemplation of the parties’ mutual 7 agreement to dismiss this case without prejudice. 8 NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 9 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated by this reference. 10 2. In consideration of this Stipulation, the parties agree to a full and complete mutual 11 waiver of any claim for any attorneys’ fees or costs incurred to date in the prosecution and 12 defense of this action as set forth in the parties’ “Mutual Waiver of Fees and Costs re: California13 Based Action.” 14 3. Plaintiffs shall file this Stipulation with the Court, requesting an order dismissing 15 this action without prejudice 16 Respectfully Submitted, 17 Dated: March 14, 2013 CARLE, MACKIE, POWER & ROSS LLP 18 By: 19 20 /s/ Kimberly Corcoran DAWN M. ROSS KIMBERLY CORCORAN Attorneys for Plaintiffs 21 22 Dated: March 14, 2013 DAVIES PEARSON, P.C. 23 By: 24 25 26 /s/ Rebecca M. Larson PETER T. PETRICH REBECCA M. LARSON Appearance Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Defendant CH2O, Inc. 27 28 CARLE, MACKIE, POWER & ROSS LLP 00286258.DOC 2 Stipulation Re: Dismissal and [Proposed] Order Of Dismissal Case No.: C12-02738 EMC 1 II. 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby 4 ordered that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 9 10 Judge of the United States District Court DERED SO OR ED IT IS DIFI AS MO NO 11 RT 12 dward Judge E ER 14 n M. Che A H 13 R NIA UNIT ED 8 S DISTRICT TE C TA Honorable Edward M. Chen The RT U O S 7 Dated: 3/20/13 LI 5 The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this matter. FO 3 N F D IS T IC T O R C 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CARLE, MACKIE, POWER & ROSS LLP 00286258.DOC 3 Stipulation Re: Dismissal and [Proposed] Order Of Dismissal Case No.: C12-02738 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?