The Sherwin-Williams Company v. L.A. Smith & Sons Inc. et al
ORDER RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH REASSIGNMENT ORDER AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 4/23/2013. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/30/2013 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 14, 2013. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order, # 2 Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2013)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STANDING ORDER FOR ALL CIVIL CASES BEFORE
DISTRICT JUDGE JON S. TIGAR
Law and Motion Calendar and Court Schedule
Judge Tigar hears Civil Law and Motion on Thursdays at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 9, 19th
Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California.
Motions must be noticed for hearing pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7. Counsel need not
reserve a hearing date in advance for civil motions. The Court may reset noticed hearing
dates, however, as its calendar requires.
Civil Case Management Conferences and Civil Pretrial Conferences will be held on
Wednesdays at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450
Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California.
Scheduling questions may be addressed to the courtroom deputy, William Noble, only; he
can be reached at (415) 522-2036.
Service of this Order Required
Within five days following the filing of the complaint, or the addition of a new party,
plaintiff is ordered to serve a copy of this Order and the Standing Order for All Judges of
the Northern District Court Concerning Joint Case Management Statements on all parties,
and to file a proof of service.
Joint Case Management Statement and Initial Case Management Conference
The Northern District Court requires civil litigants to meet and confer regarding specified
topics, including alternative dispute resolution and the discovery of electronically stored
information (“ESI”), prior to the filing of the initial joint case management statement.
Civil litigants before this Court must review and comply with the terms of the Northern
District Standing Order For All Judges Concerning Joint Case Management Statements.
In addition, the parties must review in detail the Northern District's ESI Guidelines and
Checklist for Rule 26(f) conferences. The Court discourages deviation from the ESI
Guidelines absent good cause. Failure to meet and confer regarding the required topics
prior to the initial case management conference, including alternative dispute resolution
and ESI, may, in the reasonable exercise of the Court's discretion, result in sanctions or
Chambers Copies and Proposed Orders
The Court requires chambers copies of publicly filed motions and related materials only
as required by the Civil Local Rules. The Court discourages the service of courtesy
copies of other documents, except when specifically requested by the Court.
Chambers copies must be delivered to chambers by noon on the day following filing.
For Friday filings, the Court appreciates receiving chambers copies of filings that exceed
fifty pages by 5:00 p.m. on the date of filing.
The quality, condition, and labeling of binders, when used, should be such that the Court
can easily transport and review the binders’ contents. Whenever possible, the spine of a
binder should not exceed three inches in width.
All discovery disputes shall, in the first instance, be referred to the magistrate judge
assigned to the case for resolution. The parties shall follow the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, the local rules, any applicable standing orders, and any other related orders
issued by the magistrate judge concerning the parties' obligation to meet and confer in
good faith to resolve discovery disputes.
Dated: February 11, 2013
Standing Order for All Civil Cases
Before Judge Jon S. Tigar
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?