The Sherwin-Williams Company v. L.A. Smith & Sons Inc. et al

Filing 53

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND CROSS-COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND RETAINING JURISDICTION. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 17, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2014)

1
2
3
4

R. Randy Wertz, Esq. (SBN 73128)
DRYDEN, MARGOLES, SCHIMANECK & WERTZ
A Law Corporation
555 Montgomery Street, Suite 750
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

5
6
7
8

Jeffrey D. Wilson, Esq.
YOUNG BASILE HANLON & MACFARLANE, P.C.
3001 West Big Beaver Road, Suite 624
Troy, MI 48084
Tel: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Pursuant to Pro Hac Vice Admission

9
10

Attorneys for Plaintiff, THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY
f/k/a SHERWIN-WILLIAMS AUTOMOTIVE FINISHES CORP.

11
12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN FRANCISCO BRANCH

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY f/k/a
SHERWIN-WILLIAMS AUTOMOTIVE
FINISHES CORP.,
,

)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
L.A. SMITH & SONS INC. d/b/a L.A. SMITH )
& SONS COLLISION CENTER, a California )
corporation; KIRK SMITH,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
_______________________________________ )

ACTION NO.: 3:12cv-02761-JST
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING
COMPLAINT AND CR0SS-COMPLAINT
WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND
RETAINING JURISDICTION
Judge: The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
Courtroom: 9, 19th Floor

Based on the parties’ Notice of Dismissal & Request that Court Retain Jurisdiction [Doc __]
filed in this action,

27

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

28

The complaint and the cross-complaint filed by defendants L.A. SMITH & SONS INC. d/b/a

DRYDEN,
MARGOLES,
SCHIMANECK
& WERTZ
5 5 5 M O N TGO M E R Y S TR E E T

1

S U ITE 7 5 0
S A N F R A N C IS C O ,
C A LIFO R N IA 9 41 1 1
(4 1 5 ) 3 62 -6 7 1 5

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND CR0SS-COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
AND RETAINING JURISDICTION

1

L.A. SMITH & SONS COLLISION CENTER, a California corporation; KIRK SMITH, are

2

dismissed without prejudice.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

The Court will retain jurisdiction until all payments have been made pursuant to the
Settlement Agreement attached as Exhibit A.
As set forth in the executed Judgment Note attached as Exhibit B, its maturity may be
accelerated by Plaintiff if payments are not timely made.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 17, 2014

_______________________________________
Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRYDEN,
MARGOLES,
SCHIMANECK
& WERTZ
5 5 5 M O N TGO M E R Y S TR E E T

2

S U ITE 7 5 0
S A N F R A N C IS C O ,
C A LIFO R N IA 9 41 1 1
(4 1 5 ) 3 62 -6 7 1 5

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND CR0SS-COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
AND RETAINING JURISDICTION

EXHIBIT "B"