Ingram v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company et al

Filing 167

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 166 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by PG&E Corporation, Pacific Gas & Electric Company. Case Management Statement due by 9/17/2014. Further Case Management Conference set for 10/1/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 4, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP GARY T. LAFAYETTE (State Bar No. 088666) REBECCA K. KIMURA (State Bar No. 220420) 101 Mission Street, Suite 600 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 357-4600 Facsimile: (415) 357-4605 Attorneys for Defendants PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY and PG&E CORPORATION 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN INGRAM, 12 FAX (415) 357-4600 (415) 357-4605 600 94105 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA ATTORNEYS AT LAW MISSION STREET, SUITE 101 LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP 11 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 15 STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY; PG&E CORPORATION and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 16 Case No. CV 12 2777 JST Defendants. Complaint filed: May 21, 2012 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. CV 12 2777 JST 1 1 2 STIPULATION AND REQUEST Plaintiff Steven Ingram (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Pacific Gas and Electric Company 3 and PG&E Corporation (“Defendants”) (collectively referred to as the “Parties”) through their 4 respective counsel hereby stipulate as follows: 5 WHEREAS on August 29, 2014, the Court issued an order setting a Case Management 6 Conference for September 24, 2014 and requiring the parties to file a Joint Case Management 7 Statement by September 10, 2014; and 8 9 10 WHEREAS lead trial counsel for Defendants, Gary T. Lafayette, is unavailable to attend the Case Management Conference on September 24, 2014 as he will be out of state from September 22-25, 2014 on a business trip that has been planned for over six months; (415) 357-4600 (415) 357-4605 FAX NOW, THEREFORE, DEFENDANTS HEREBY REQUEST AND PLAINTIFF DOES 12 600 94105 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA ATTORNEYS AT LAW MISSION STREET, SUITE 101 LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP 11 NOT OPPOSE that the Case Management Conference be continued by one week to October 1, 13 2014 at 2:00 p.m. and that the deadline to file a Joint Case Management Statement be continued 14 by one week to September 17, 2014. 15 16 DATED: September 4, 2014 17 /s/ Dow W. Patten DOW W. PATTEN Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVEN INGRAM 18 19 20 SMITH PATTEN DATED: September 4, 2014 21 LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP /s/ Gary T. Lafayette GARY T. LAFAYETTE Attorney for Defendants PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY and PG&E CORPORATION 22 23 24 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 25 I hereby attest that I have obtained the permission of Dow W. Patten, counsel for Plaintiff, 26 for the filing of this stipulation. 27 28 /s/ Gary T. Lafayette GARY T. LAFAYETTE STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. CV 12 2777 JST 2 ORDER 1 Good cause appearing therefor and pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, it is hereby 2 ORDERED that the Case Management Conference be continued to October 1, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. 3 and that the deadline to file a Joint Case Management Statement be continued to September 17, 4 2014. FAX (415) 357-4600 (415) 357-4605 600 94105 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA ATTORNEYS AT LAW MISSION STREET, SUITE 101 LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP 13 ER R NIA n S. J u d ge J o H 12 RT 11 NO 10 ED JON S. TIGAR ORDER O I StatesS UnitedT IS District Judge Ti ga r FO 9 DATED: September 4, 2014 C LI 8 UNIT ED 7 T TA RT U O S 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRIC E T A 5 N F D IS T IC T O R C 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. CV 12 2777 JST 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?