Ingram v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company et al
Filing
167
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 166 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by PG&E Corporation, Pacific Gas & Electric Company. Case Management Statement due by 9/17/2014. Further Case Management Conference set for 10/1/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 4, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
GARY T. LAFAYETTE (State Bar No. 088666)
REBECCA K. KIMURA (State Bar No. 220420)
101 Mission Street, Suite 600
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 357-4600
Facsimile: (415) 357-4605
Attorneys for Defendants
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY and
PG&E CORPORATION
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
STEVEN INGRAM,
12
FAX
(415) 357-4600
(415) 357-4605
600
94105
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
MISSION STREET, SUITE
101
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
11
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
15
STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO
CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC
COMPANY; PG&E CORPORATION and
DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
16
Case No. CV 12 2777 JST
Defendants.
Complaint filed: May 21, 2012
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. CV 12 2777 JST
1
1
2
STIPULATION AND REQUEST
Plaintiff Steven Ingram (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Pacific Gas and Electric Company
3
and PG&E Corporation (“Defendants”) (collectively referred to as the “Parties”) through their
4
respective counsel hereby stipulate as follows:
5
WHEREAS on August 29, 2014, the Court issued an order setting a Case Management
6
Conference for September 24, 2014 and requiring the parties to file a Joint Case Management
7
Statement by September 10, 2014; and
8
9
10
WHEREAS lead trial counsel for Defendants, Gary T. Lafayette, is unavailable to attend
the Case Management Conference on September 24, 2014 as he will be out of state from
September 22-25, 2014 on a business trip that has been planned for over six months;
(415) 357-4600
(415) 357-4605
FAX
NOW, THEREFORE, DEFENDANTS HEREBY REQUEST AND PLAINTIFF DOES
12
600
94105
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
MISSION STREET, SUITE
101
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
11
NOT OPPOSE that the Case Management Conference be continued by one week to October 1,
13
2014 at 2:00 p.m. and that the deadline to file a Joint Case Management Statement be continued
14
by one week to September 17, 2014.
15
16
DATED: September 4, 2014
17
/s/ Dow W. Patten
DOW W. PATTEN
Attorneys for Plaintiff
STEVEN INGRAM
18
19
20
SMITH PATTEN
DATED: September 4, 2014
21
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
/s/ Gary T. Lafayette
GARY T. LAFAYETTE
Attorney for Defendants
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY and
PG&E CORPORATION
22
23
24
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
25
I hereby attest that I have obtained the permission of Dow W. Patten, counsel for Plaintiff,
26
for the filing of this stipulation.
27
28
/s/ Gary T. Lafayette
GARY T. LAFAYETTE
STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. CV 12 2777 JST
2
ORDER
1
Good cause appearing therefor and pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, it is hereby
2
ORDERED that the Case Management Conference be continued to October 1, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.
3
and that the deadline to file a Joint Case Management Statement be continued to September 17,
4
2014.
FAX
(415) 357-4600
(415) 357-4605
600
94105
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
MISSION STREET, SUITE
101
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
13
ER
R NIA
n S.
J u d ge J o
H
12
RT
11
NO
10
ED
JON S. TIGAR ORDER
O
I StatesS
UnitedT IS District Judge
Ti ga r
FO
9
DATED: September 4, 2014
C
LI
8
UNIT
ED
7
T
TA
RT
U
O
S
6
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRIC
E
T
A
5
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. CV 12 2777 JST
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?