Zeoli v. The State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabiliation et al

Filing 69

ORDER REGARDING PARTIES' DISCOVERY DISPUTE re 68 Statement. By Friday, April 4, 2014, Mr. Zeoli shall lodge unredacted versions of the medical records at issue with the Court for in camera review. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/31/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JOSEPH ZEOLI, Case No. 12-cv-02785-WHO Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER REGARDING PARTIES' DISCOVERY DISPUTE 9 10 11 THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILIATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 68 United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff Joseph Zeoli asserts that he suffered negative health impacts due to the medical 14 care he received for his HIV condition while he was incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison. See 15 Dkt. No. 14 (first amended complaint). Mr. Zeoli produced three pages of medical records to the 16 defendants. Mr. Zeoli seeks to redact portions of the medical records as “non-relevant and highly 17 private.” The parties dispute whether the portions Mr. Zeoli seeks to redact are relevant. 18 Mr. Zeoli proposes an in camera review of the three documents. See Dkt. No. 68 at 1. 19 The defendants do not object to this proposal. Accordingly, by Friday April 4, 2014, Mr. Zeoli 20 shall lodge unredacted versions of the medical records at issue with the Court for in camera 21 review. Following my review of the records, I will determine whether the portions at issue are 22 properly redacted and whether additional briefing or argument is necessary. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 31, 2014 ______________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?