Our Children's Earth Foundation v. Pabco Building Products, LLC et al
Filing
21
ORDER CONTINUING the March 14, 2013 case management conference in light of the parties' apparent settlement. Case Management Statement due by 5/30/2013. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/6/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 3/5/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
Northern District of California
10
San Francisco Division
OUR CHILDREN’S EARTH
FOUNDATION,
No. C 12-02791 LB
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
ORDER CONTINUING THE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IN
LIGHT OF THE PARTIES’
APPARENT SETTLEMENT
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
PABCO BUILDING PRODUCTS, LLC, et
al.,
[Re: ECF No. 20]
15
16
17
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
On March 4, 2013, the parties to this action filed a notice informing the court that they have
18
reached a settlement and that they hope to have the settlement agreement executed and approved
19
within 45 days. See 3/4/2013 Notice, ECF No. 20. Rather than vacate the upcoming March 14,
20
2013 case management conference as the parties’ request, the court CONTINUES the case
21
management conference to June 6, 2013 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, United States
22
District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California, 94102. The parties shall file a
23
joint case management conference statement by May 30, 2013. If the parties file a “Stipulation for
24
Approval of Settlement Agreement and Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Claims with Prejudice” before that
25
time (as they suggest they will), the case management conference will be vacated.
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 5, 2013
_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
28
C 12-02791 LB
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?