Georgia-Pacific LLC v. OfficeMax Incorporated et al

Filing 105

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 104 STIPULATION Regarding Filing of Opposition to and Reply in Support of OfficeMax's Motion for Summary Judgment. Response due by 7/24/2013. Reply due by 8/7/2013. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/02/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP
Belynda Reck (SBN 163561)
Diana Biason (SBN 247274)
550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

7

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC

8

[Counsel Listing Continued on Next Page]

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Hunton & Williams LLP

550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

17

GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
________________________________
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

18

OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED,

13
14

15
16

19
20
21

22
23
24

Third Party Plaintiffs,
v.
LOUISIANA-PACIFIC
CORPORATION, CITY OF FORT
BRAGG and DOES 1-10 inclusive,
Third-Party Defendants.
________________________________
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

CASE NO.: 12-02797 WHO
STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING FILING OF
OPPOSITION TO AND REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF OFFICEMAX’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick
Complaint Filed: May 31, 2012
Amd. Complaint Filed: June 4, 2012
2nd Amd. Complaint Filed: May 21, 2012
3P Complaint Filed: August 30, 2012
1st Amd. 3P Cplt. Filed: October 31, 2012
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING FILING OF OPPOSITION TO
AND REPLY IN SUPPORT OF OFFICEMAX’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 12-02797 WHO

1
2
3
4
5

HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP
Jeffrey N. Martin (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20037
Telephone: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC

6
7

8
9

Hunton & Williams LLP

550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627

10
11
12
13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING FILING OF OPPOSITION TO
AND REPLY IN SUPPORT OF OFFICEMAX’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 12-02797 WHO

1

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC (“Georgia-Pacific”) and

2

Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff OfficeMax Incorporated (“OfficeMax”) stipulate and

3

declare as follows:

4
5

WHEREAS, OfficeMax filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on claims
asserted against it by Georgia-Pacific on June 24, 2013;

6

WHEREAS, pursuant to N. D. Cal. Local Rule 7-3(a), Georgia-Pacific’s

7

Opposition to OfficeMax’s Motion for Summary Judgment is due July 8, 2013;

8
9

Hunton & Williams LLP

550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627

10
11
12

WHEREAS, pursuant to N. D. Cal. Local Rule 7-3(c), OfficeMax’s Reply in
Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment is due July 15, 2013;
WHEREAS, pursuant to N. D. Cal. Local Rule 6-2(a), Georgia-Pacific and
OfficeMax may stipulate to extend time frames set in the Local Rules;
WHEREAS, the hearing on OfficeMax’s Motion for Summary Judgment is

13

currently set for September 11, 2013 and this Stipulation will not alter the date of any

14

event or any deadline already fixed by Court order;

15

WHEREAS, Georgia-Pacific needs additional time to file an Opposition to

16

OfficeMax’s Motion for Summary Judgment and OfficeMax needs additional time to

17

file its Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment because the parties are

18

preparing for private mediation set for July 29-30, 2013;

19
20
21

22
23
24

WHEREAS, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation and the City of Fort Bragg have
indicated that they have no objection to the extension of the briefing schedule; and
WHEREAS, nothing in this stipulation is or shall be construed as an admission
regarding any portion of OfficeMax’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties through their respective attorneys of record,
stipulate as follows:

25
26
27
28

3
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING FILING OF OPPOSITION TO
AND REPLY IN SUPPORT OF OFFICEMAX’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 12-02797 WHO

1

1. The deadline for Georgia-Pacific to file its Opposition to OfficeMax’s

2

Motion for Summary Judgment is extended up to and including July

3

24, 2013.

4

2. The deadline for OfficeMax to file its Reply to Georgia-Pacific’s

5

Opposition to OfficeMax’s Motion for Summary Judgment is

6

extended up to and including August 7, 2013.

7

3. The hearing on this matter will take place on September 11, 2013.

8
9

DATED: July 2, 2013

Hunton & Williams LLP

550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627

10

HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP
By:

11
12

/s/
Belynda Reck
Attorney for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC

13
14

DATED: July 2, 2013

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN
By:

15
16

/s/
Mark Elliott
Attorney for Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff
OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED

17
18
19
20

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 2, 2013
Hon. William H. Orrick
United States District Judge

21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING FILING OF OPPOSITION TO
OF OFFICEMAX’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 12-02797 WHO

AND REPLY IN SUPPORT
29073.000398 EMF_US 46275470v1