F. ovo Aetna
Filing
163
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE STIPULATION TO FILE EVIDENTIARY RECORD IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT. Given that the circumstances since the filing of the Stipulation have markedly changed, the Stipulation is denied without prejudice to renewal, if appropriate, at a later date. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 16, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
DENNIS F., CAROL F., and GRACE F.,
Plaintiffs,
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Case No. 12-cv-02819-MMC
v.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant.
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE STIPULATION TO FILE
EVIDENTIARY RECORD IN
ELECTRONIC FORMAT
Re: Dkt. No. 145
13
14
15
On November 3, 2015, the above-titled action, which at the time was brought on
16
behalf of twenty-seven named plaintiffs, was reassigned to the undersigned. On
17
November 13, 2015, in anticipation of a then impending deadline for the filing of cross-
18
motions for summary judgment, the parties filed a “Joint Stipulation to File Full Scope of
19
Evidence to be Considered by the Court in Electronic Format” (hereinafter, “Stipulation”),
20
by which the parties requested permission to file the evidentiary record on a “USB drive.”
21
(See Stipulation, filed Nov. 13, 2015, at 1:24.)
22
Thereafter, however, at the plaintiffs’ request for relief from the above-referenced
23
deadline, the Court vacated the briefing schedule, directed the parties to address whether
24
the plaintiffs’ claims should be severed (see Order, filed Nov. 20, 2015), and, on the
25
parties’ subsequent stipulation, granted severance of all remaining claims other than the
26
single claim asserted by the first three named plaintiffs (see Order, filed Jan. 22, 2016).
27
Given that the circumstances since the filing of the Stipulation have markedly
28
changed, the Stipulation is hereby DENIED without prejudice to renewal, if appropriate, at
1
2
3
a later date.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 16, 2016
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?