F. ovo Aetna

Filing 209

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON STANDARD OF REVIEW. Defendant must submit its supplemental memorandum in support of its opposition no later than January 13, 2017. Plaintiffs must submit their supplemental reply no later than February 6, 2017. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 01/06/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 RICHARD J. DOREN, SBN 124666 rdoren@gibsondunn.com HEATHER L. RICHARDSON, SBN 246517 hrichardson@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 Telephone: 213.229.7000 Facsimile: 213.229.7520 Attorneys for Defendant, AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DENNIS F., CAROL F., and GRACE F.; Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 14 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. 15 CASE NO. CV-12-2819-MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON STANDARD OF REVIEW The Hon. Maxine M. Chesney Third Amended Complaint Filed: 04/13/2016 16 17 18 KIM B. and AVIVA B. 19 Plaintiffs, 20 Complaint Filed: 03/22/2016 v. 21 CASE NO. 3:16-cv-01395-MMC AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 22 Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON STANDARD OF REVIEW, LEAD CASE NO. 12-CV-02819-MMC 1 ALISON B. and DANIEL B. Plaintiffs, 2 3 Complaint Filed: 03/22/2016 v. 4 CASE NO. 3:16-cv-01398-MMC AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. 5 6 WILLIAM B. and RYAN B. Plaintiffs, 7 8 Complaint Filed: 03/22/2016 v. 9 CASE NO. 3:16-cv-01402-MMC AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. 10 11 LLOYD B. and TALYA B. Plaintiffs, 12 13 Complaint Filed: 03/22/2016 v. 14 CASE NO. 3:16-cv-01405-MMC AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. 15 16 RODNEY K. and BRIAN K. Plaintiffs, 17 18 Complaint Filed: 03/22/2016 v. 19 CASE NO. 3:16-cv-01397-MMC AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. 20 21 MARK L. and ELAINE L. Plaintiffs, 22 23 Complaint Filed: 03/22/2016 v. 24 CASE NO. 3:16-cv-01399-MMC AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 25 Defendant. 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON STANDARD OF REVIEW, LEAD CASE NO. 12-CV-02819-MMC 1 R.M. and M.M. CASE NO. 3:16-cv-01401-MMC Plaintiffs, 2 3 v. 4 Complaint Filed: 03/22/2016 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. 5 6 PERRY P. and EVAN P. Plaintiffs, 7 8 Complaint Filed: 03/22/2016 v. 9 CASE NO. 3:16-cv-01400-MMC AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 10 Defendant. 11 RICHARD R. and SUSANNA R. Plaintiffs, 12 13 Complaint Filed: 03/22/2016 v. 14 CASE NO. 3:16-cv-01404-MMC AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. 15 16 DAGMAR W. and SAMANTHA W.. Plaintiffs, 17 18 Complaint Filed: 03/22/2016 v. 19 CASE NO. 3:16-cv-01403-MMC AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. 20 21 CHERYL N. and TRISTAN W. 22 Plaintiffs, 23 Complaint Filed: 03/22/2016 v. 24 CASE NO. 3:16-cv-01406-MMC AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 25 Defendant. 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON STANDARD OF REVIEW, LEAD CASE NO. 12-CV-02819-MMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ORDER GOOD CAUSE being shown in the Parties’ Joint Stipulation to Extend Time for Supplemental Briefing on Standard of Review, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company must submit supplemental briefing in support if its opposition brief on standard of review by January 13, 2017. 2. Plaintiffs must submit a supplemental reply by February 6, 2017. IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 6th DATED this ____ day of January, 2017 10 11 12 13 14 15 _______________________________________ The Hon. Maxine M. Chesney United States District Court Judge for the Northern District of California 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON STANDARD OF REVIEW, LEAD CASE NO. 12-CV-02819-MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?