F. ovo Aetna

Filing 29

Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting in part and denying in part 21 Stipulation.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 9 11 DENNIS F., et al., Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE, 15 Defendant. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 12-cv-02819-SC ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO AMEND 17 18 The parties in the above-captioned matter stipulate and move 19 the Court to allow Plaintiffs to amend their complaint so as to (1) 20 formally name Grace F., Kestrel P., and Emily T. as Plaintiffs; and 21 (2) to indicate the appointment of Ed. L. and Mindy L. as guardians 22 of Mariah L. 23 second is not. 24 appoint Mindy L. as the guardian ad litem for Mariah L., ECF No. 25 24, and Plaintiffs have yet to move to appoint Ed. L as guardian ad 26 litem. 27 indicate the appointment of Ed. L and Mindy L. as guardians. 28 motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and Plaintiffs may The first proposed amendment is acceptable but the The Court has already denied Plaintiffs' motion to Accordingly, Plaintiffs may not amend their complaint to The 1 amend their Complaint in a manner consistent with the guidance set 2 forth in this Order. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 Dated: January 14, 2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?