F. ovo Aetna
Filing
29
Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting in part and denying in part 21 Stipulation.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
9
11
DENNIS F., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
v.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE,
15
Defendant.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 12-cv-02819-SC
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS'
MOTION TO AMEND
17
18
The parties in the above-captioned matter stipulate and move
19
the Court to allow Plaintiffs to amend their complaint so as to (1)
20
formally name Grace F., Kestrel P., and Emily T. as Plaintiffs; and
21
(2) to indicate the appointment of Ed. L. and Mindy L. as guardians
22
of Mariah L.
23
second is not.
24
appoint Mindy L. as the guardian ad litem for Mariah L., ECF No.
25
24, and Plaintiffs have yet to move to appoint Ed. L as guardian ad
26
litem.
27
indicate the appointment of Ed. L and Mindy L. as guardians.
28
motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and Plaintiffs may
The first proposed amendment is acceptable but the
The Court has already denied Plaintiffs' motion to
Accordingly, Plaintiffs may not amend their complaint to
The
1
amend their Complaint in a manner consistent with the guidance set
2
forth in this Order.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
Dated: January 14, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?