Burton v. Time Warner Cable Inc.

Filing 12

STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time for Defendant Time Warner Cable Inc. to Respond to Complaint to 8/2/12. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

BRYAN A. MERRYMAN (SBN 134357)
RACHEL J. FELDMAN (SBN 246394)
JON A. ALON (SBN 265102)
WHITE & CASE LLP
633 W. Fifth Street, Suite 1900
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2007
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
TIME WARNER CABLE INC.

8
9
10
11
12

JOSEPH J. SIPRUT (Pro Hac Vice Pending)
JAMES M. MCCLINTICK
SIPRUT PC
122 South Michigan Avenue, Suite 1850
Chicago, IL 60603
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

13
14
15
16

TODD C. ATKINS
SIPRUT PC
701 B Street, Suite 1170
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

17
18

Attorneys for Plaintiff
TODD BURTON

19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

20

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

21

TODD BURTON, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated,

22
Plaintiff,
23
v.
24
TIME WARNER CABLE, INC.,

NO. 3:12-cv-02828-JCS
SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING
TIME FOR DEFENDANT TIME
WARNER CABLE INC. TO RESPOND
TO COMPLAINT

25
26

Defendant.

Judge: Hon. Samuel Conti
Complaint Filed: June 1, 2012
Trial Date: None

27
28

LOSANGELES 957766 (2K)

SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TIME
WARNER CABLE INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; 3:12-CV-02828-JCS

1

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Todd Burton, on behalf of himself and all others

2

similarly situated (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant Time Warner Cable Inc. (“Defendant”)

3

(collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to

4

extend Defendant’s time to respond to the Complaint.

5

WHEREAS, on June 1, 2012, Plaintiff filed a putative class action Complaint against

6

Defendant, alleging violations of the Cable Communications Policy Act, 47 U.S.C. § 551, et seq.,

7

the California Consumer Records Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.80, et seq., and California Penal

8

Code § 637.5, and breach of implied contract.

9

WHEREAS, Defendant accepted service of the Complaint on June 5, 2012.

10
11

WHEREAS, on June 12, 2012, this Court entered an order granting the Parties’ stipulation
to extend Defendant’s deadline to respond to the Complaint to July 26, 2012.

12
13

WHEREAS, Defendant intends to file a motion to dismiss based on, among other grounds,
improper venue, and Plaintiff has agreed to take Defendant’s argument under advisement.

14

WHEREAS, in order to give the Parties an opportunity to resolve this issue by agreement,

15

and in the interest of conserving the Parties’ resources and judicial economy, Plaintiff has agreed

16

to a further extension of Defendant’s time to respond to the Complaint of one week to August 2,

17

2012.

18

WHEREAS, this extension is not sought for the purpose of unnecessary delay.

19

WHEREAS, the extension of time sought will not alter the date of any event or deadline

20

already fixed by Court order.

21

///

22

///

23

///

24
25
26
27
28
1
LOSANGELES 957766 (2K)

SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TIME
WARNER CABLE INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; 3:12-CV-02828-JCS

1
2

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE the time for
Defendant to respond to the Complaint in this action shall be extended to August 2, 2012.

3
4

Dated: July 19, 2012

WHITE & CASE LLP
By:

5
6
7

Dated: July 19, 2012

/s/ Bryan A. Merryman
Bryan A. Merryman
Attorneys for Defendant
Time Warner Cable Inc.

SIPRUT PC

8

By:

9
10

/s/ Todd C. Atkins
Todd C. Atkins
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Todd Burton

11

onti

amuel C

NO

15

Judge S

17

A

H

ER

LI

RT

16

FO

14

ERED

O ORD

IT IS S

R NIA

UNIT
ED

13

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

S

12

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
LOSANGELES 957766 (2K)

SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TIME
WARNER CABLE INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; 3:12-CV-02828-JCS

DECLARATION OF BRYAN A. MERRYMAN

1
2

I, Bryan A. Merryman, am an attorney of record for Defendant Time Warner Cable Inc.

3

Todd C. Atkins, attorney of record for Plaintiff Todd Burton, gave me his concurrence in the

4

filing of the document titled “SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR

5

DEFENDANT TIME WARNER CABLE INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT,” which

6

concurrence shall serve in lieu of his signature on that filed document. I have obtained and will

7

maintain records to support this concurrence for subsequent production to the Court if so ordered

8

or for inspection upon request by a party until one year after final resolution of the action

9

(including appeal, if any).

10
11

Dated: July 19, 2012

WHITE & CASE LLP

12
By:

13
14

/s/ Bryan A. Merryman
Bryan A. Merryman
Attorneys for Defendant
Time Warner Cable Inc.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
LOSANGELES 957766 (2K)

SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TIME
WARNER CABLE INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; 3:12-CV-02828-JCS