Day v. Prudential Insurance Company of America et al

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 25 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend ADR Deadline and Continue Further Case Management Conference filed by Prudential Insurance Company of America Case Management Statement due by 5/2/2013. Tel. Further Case Management Conference set for 5/9/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/5/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN DAY, Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA (THE), 15 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES CORPORATION LONG-TERM 16 DISABILITY PLAN, and DOES 1 through 10, 17 Defendants. 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV-12-2835 EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE AND CONTINUE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Date: Time: Ctrm: Judge: March 7, 2013 10:30 a.m. 5 Hon. Edward M. Chen Good cause having been shown, the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Extend the 19 20 ADR Deadline and Continue the Further Case Management Conference is hereby 21 GRANTED. The deadline for the parties to complete private mediation is extended 22 by 60 days (to April 30, 2013); and the Further Case Management Conference is 23 continued to Thursday, May 9, 2013 at 10:30 a.m., with an updated joint Case 24 Management Conference Statement to be filed by May 3, 2013. May 2, 2013. IT IS SO ORDERED. 28 LAW OFFICES S _________________________________ Hon. Edward M. Chen ED ER United StatesSO ORDCourt Judge T IS District D I UNIT ED Dated: ___________________ 1 0.0 NO MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES LLP RT U O 27 3/5/13 DIFIE AS MO R NIA 26 S DISTRICT TE C TA Case No. CV-12-2835 EMC ORDER GRANTING STIP TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE d M. Chen AND CONTINUE FURTHER CMC dwar R Judge E FO 25

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?