EMC Corporation v. Bright Response, LLC

Filing 41

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Briefing Schedule of Defendant's Motions to Dismiss and/or Transfer, 23 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , 25 MOTION to Dismiss or Transfer in Fa vor of First-Filed Action, 30 MOTION for Discovery EMC's Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery to Respond to Defendant's Motions to Dismiss and/or Transfer., STIPULATION AND ORDER Responses due by 8/21/2012. Replies due by 8/28/2012. Motion Hearing set for 9/14/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/13/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2012)

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (CA Bar No. 170151) 2 Antonio R. Sistos (CA Bar No. 238847) Emily C. O’Brien (CA Bar No. 240072) 3 Andrew M. Holmes (CA Bar No. 260475) 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 4 San Francisco, California 94111 5 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 6 Email: charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com antoniosistos@quinnemanuel.com 7 emilyobrien@quinnemanuel.com drewholmes@quinnemanuel.com 8 9 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Patrick Curran (Pro Hac Vice) 10 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor 11 New York, NY 10010 Telephone: (212) 849-7000 (212) 849-7100 12 Facsimile: Email: patrickcurran@quinnemanuel.com 13 [Additional Counsel Listed on Complaint] 14 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff EMC Corporation 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 19 20 CASE NO. 3:12-cv-02841-EMC EMC CORPORATION, 21 Plaintiff, 22 23 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND/OR TRANSFER vs. [L.R. 6-1, 6-2, 7-12] 24 BRIGHT RESPONSE, LLC, 25 Defendant. 26 27 28 02961.62479/4903591.1 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. 3:12-cv-02841-EMC 1 Pursuant to this Court’s Order (Dkt. No. 39) and Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, 2 EMC Corporation (“EMC”) and Bright Response, LLC (“Bright Response,” and together with 3 EMC the “Parties”) respectfully declare and stipulate to continue the briefing schedule for Bright 4 Response’s motions to dismiss and/or transfer (Dkt. Nos. 23 and 25) as follows: 5 1. The due date for EMC’s Oppositions to the Bright Response motions to 6 dismiss and/or transfer (Dkt. Nos. 23 and 25) is continued from August 14, 7 2012 to no later than August 21, 2012. 8 2. The due date for Bright Response’s Replies in support of its motions to 9 dismiss and/or transfer (Dkt. Nos. 23 and 25) is continued from August 21, 2012 to no later than August 28, 2012. 10 11 The purpose for the extensions of time is to allow EMC to investigate the issues and 12 allegations raised in Bright Response’s motions. In accordance with Civil Local Rule 6-2(a)(2), 13 the only time modifications to the case thus far have been two stipulated extensions of time for 14 Bright Response to respond to the complaint. (Dkt. Nos. 12 and 17.) In accordance with Civil 15 Local Rule 6-2(a)(3), the Parties do not believe that the requested time modifications will have any 16 impact on the case schedule as one has not yet been set. 17 SO STIPULATED: 18 19 DATED: August 10, 2012 20 21 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 22 By /s/ Andrew M. Holmes Andrew M. Holmes 23 Attorneys for Plaintiff EMC Corporation 24 DATED: August 10, 2012 BLACK CHANG & HAMILL LLP 25 26 By /s/ Bradford J. Black Bradford J. Black 27 Attorneys for Defendant Bright Response, LLC 28 02961.62479/4903591.1 2 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. 3:12-cv-02841-EMC 1 2 ATTESTATION I, Andrew M. Holmes, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has 3 been obtained from Bradford J. Black, counsel for Bright Response, LLC. I declare under penalty 4 of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 5 Executed this 10th day of August, 2012 in San Francisco, California. 6 By /s/ Andrew M. Holmes Andrew M. Holmes 7 8 9 10 12 8/13/12 DATED: ______________________ S DISTRICT TE C TA _____________________________ ED United States District JudgeSO ORDER RT 16 18 R NIA dwa Judge E ER A H 17 hen rd M. C NO 15 FO 14 IT IS LI 13 UNIT ED S PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. RT U O 11 N F D IS T IC T O R C 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02961.62479/4903591.1 3 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NO. 3:12-cv-02841-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?