Brazil v. Office of Personnel Management
Filing
44
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 43 JOINT STIPULATION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE DATES. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/16/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
AMELIA BYRNES BRAZIL,
Case No. 12-cv-02898-WHO
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT,
Re: Dkt. Nos. 40, 43
Defendant.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO
FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
TO CONTINUE DATES
12
13
14
15
The parties submitted a Joint Stipulation to File Amended Complaint and to Continue
Dates. Having reviewed the stipulation, the Court ORDERS the following:
16
17
1.
GRANTED.
18
19
20
Plaintiff’s request to file the First Amended Complaint, lodged with the Court, is
2.
The First Amended Complaint is deemed filed as of the date of this
3.
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 16-5 (Procedure in Actions for Review on an
Order.
21
Administrative Record), Defendant shall serve and file an answer within 90 days of receipt of
22
service of the summons and complaint.
23
24
25
26
4.
As Defendant previously filed the administrative record in this matter, Defendant is
not required to re-file the administrative record with its answer to the First Amended Complaint.
5.
The briefing dates in the March 4, 2013, order (Dkt. No. 34) are continued as
follows:
27
28
Current date
Plaintiff to file opening motion:
New date
6/25/13
10/22/13
1
Defendant to file opposition and cross-motion:
7/9/13
11/5/13
2
Plaintiff to file reply:
7/23/13
11/19/13
3
Defendant to file sur-reply:
8/6/13
12/6/13
4
Hearing to be held:
8/20/13
1/8/14 at 2:00 pm
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated:
7
8
9
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?