Brazil v. Office of Personnel Management
Filing
47
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATES re 46 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/11/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Lisa S. Kantor, Esq. State Bar No. 110678
e-mail: lkantor@kantorlaw.net
Elizabeth K. Green, Esq. State Bar No. 199634
e-mail: egreen@kantorlaw.net
KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, CA 91324
Telephone: (818) 886-2525
Facsimile: (818) 350-6272
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
AMELIA BYRNES-BRAZIL
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
KANTOR & KANTOR LLP
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, California 91324
(818) 886 2525
12
AMELIA BYRNES BRAZIL,
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT,
Defendant.
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: C 12-02898-WHO
ORDER ON
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
DATES
Complaint filed: June 4, 2012
18
19
20
21
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, Amelia Byrnes
22
Brazil, by and through her attorneys of record, Kantor & Kantor LLP, and Office of
23
Personnel Management by and through its attorneys of record, to continue the
24
briefing dates.
25
26
The parties’ stipulation to continue the briefing dates in the Court’s July 16,
2013 order as follows:
27
28
ORDER ON STIPLUATION TO CONTINUE DATES
Current date
1
New date
2
Plaintiff to file opening motion:
10/22/13
10/28/13
3
Defendant to file opposition and cross-motion:
11/5/13
11/18/13
4
Plaintiff to file reply:
11/19/13
12/2/13
5
Defendant to file sur-reply:
12/6/13
12/16/13
6
7
8
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED.
9
10
11
DATED: October 11, 2013
BY: ______________________________
Honorable William H. Orrick
United States District Court Judge
KANTOR & KANTOR LLP
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, California 91324
(818) 886 2525
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER ON STIPLUATION TO CONTINUE DATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?