Minter et al v. City of San Pablo et al

Filing 121

THIRD PRETRIAL ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting in part and denying in part 113 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.(jsclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AHMIK HOPKINS MINTER ARI, et al., Case No. 12-cv-02905-JSC Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 10 MARK EDWARD GALIOS, Defendant. 11 THIRD PRETRIAL ORDER; ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT United States District Court Northern District of California Re: Dkt. No. 113 12 13 Following the final pretrial conference held on April 3, 2014, the Court orders as follows: 14 Plaintiffs shall notify Defendant by Tuesday, April 8, 2014 as to whether Plaintiffs will be 15 seeking economic damages. Also, in the event Akinlabi Minter’s incarceration history becomes 16 relevant and admissible, Plaintiffs shall confer with Defendant in advance of trial regarding a 17 stipulation about that history. 18 19 20 Plaintiffs shall also notify Defendant by Friday, April 11, 2014 at noon as to which witnesses Plaintiffs intend to call during the first two days of trial. Finally, Defendant’s supplemental motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED in 21 part and DENIED in part. Because the Court concludes and Plaintiffs do not dispute that the 22 “purpose to harm” standard applies to their Fourteenth Amendment claim, see Porter v. Osborn, 23 546 F.3d 1131, 1137 (9th Cir. 2008), the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion on the issue of the 24 applicable standard. The motion is otherwise denied without prejudice since a reasonable jury 25 could find, based on the previous summary judgment record, that Defendant shot Minter with a 26 purpose to harm unrelated to a legitimate law-enforcement objective. See A.D. v. Cal. Highway 27 Patrol, 712 F.3d 446 (9th Cir. 2013). 28 1 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 4, 2014 ______________________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?