Minter et al v. City of San Pablo et al
Filing
121
THIRD PRETRIAL ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting in part and denying in part 113 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.(jsclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
AHMIK HOPKINS MINTER ARI, et al.,
Case No. 12-cv-02905-JSC
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10
MARK EDWARD GALIOS,
Defendant.
11
THIRD PRETRIAL ORDER; ORDER
GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING
IN PART DEFENDANT'S
SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Re: Dkt. No. 113
12
13
Following the final pretrial conference held on April 3, 2014, the Court orders as follows:
14
Plaintiffs shall notify Defendant by Tuesday, April 8, 2014 as to whether Plaintiffs will be
15
seeking economic damages. Also, in the event Akinlabi Minter’s incarceration history becomes
16
relevant and admissible, Plaintiffs shall confer with Defendant in advance of trial regarding a
17
stipulation about that history.
18
19
20
Plaintiffs shall also notify Defendant by Friday, April 11, 2014 at noon as to which
witnesses Plaintiffs intend to call during the first two days of trial.
Finally, Defendant’s supplemental motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED in
21
part and DENIED in part. Because the Court concludes and Plaintiffs do not dispute that the
22
“purpose to harm” standard applies to their Fourteenth Amendment claim, see Porter v. Osborn,
23
546 F.3d 1131, 1137 (9th Cir. 2008), the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion on the issue of the
24
applicable standard. The motion is otherwise denied without prejudice since a reasonable jury
25
could find, based on the previous summary judgment record, that Defendant shot Minter with a
26
purpose to harm unrelated to a legitimate law-enforcement objective. See A.D. v. Cal. Highway
27
Patrol, 712 F.3d 446 (9th Cir. 2013).
28
1
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 4, 2014
______________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?