Missud v. Oakland Coliseum Joint Venture et al

Filing 25

STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR DFTS CITY OF OAKLAND AND ALAMEDA COUNTY TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 10/26/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2012)

1 STEPHEN A. SCOTT (SBN 67467)
[e-mail]
2 M. COLLEEN RYAN (SBN 258359)
[e-mail]
3 HAYES SCOTT BONINO ELLINGSON & McLAY, LLP
203 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 480
4 Redwood City, CA 94065
Telephone:
650.637.9100
650.637.8071
5 Facsimile:
6 Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF OAKLAND, ALAMEDA COUNTY,
7 OAKLAND COLISEUM JOINT VENTURE and
SMG CORPORATION
8
PATRICK MISSUD (SBN 219614)
9 91 San Juan Avenue
San Francisco, California 94112
10 [e-mail]
11 Attorney and Plaintiff in Pro Per
12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15 PATRICK A. MISSUD, and those similarly
situated,
16
Plaintiff,
17
v.
18
OAKLAND COLISEUM JOINT VENTURE;
19 CITY OF OAKLAND; ALAMEDA
COUNTY; SMG CORPORATION; DOES 120 100; ROE Corporations I-X,

22

26
27

Complaint filed: June 7, 2012
New Deadline to Respond: November 2,
2012

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 5 and 6-1, the parties, through their respective counsel of
record, hereby stipulate as follows:

24
25

STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS CITY OF OAKLAND
AND ALAMEDA COUNTY TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Defendants.

21

23

CASE NO. C12-02967

1.

Plaintiff Patrick Missud (“Missud”) filed a Complaint against Oakland Coliseum

Joint Venture, City of Oakland, Alameda County, SMG Corporation and Does 1 – 100 on June 7,
2012.
2.

Missud and defendants City of Oakland and Alameda County stipulate and agree that

28
413051

-1STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING - CASE NO. C12-02967

1 defendants City of Oakland and Alameda County’s responsive pleading will be filed no later than
2 November 2, 2012.
3

3.

The extension is further requested on the grounds that defendants’ counsel recently

4 received the file and would like to explore possible resolution with plaintiff before incurring the
5 expense of a response.
6

For the foregoing reasons, the parties hereby stipulate and agree to an extension to

7 November 2, 2012 as the final date for defendants City of Oakland and Alameda County to file their
8 responsive pleading.
9

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

10
11 Dated: October 25, 2012

PATRICK MISSUD

12
By: /s/ Patrick Missud
Attorney and Plaintiff in Pro Per

13
14
15 Dated: October 25 , 2012

HAYES SCOTT BONINO ELLINGSON & MCLAY, LLP

16
17

By: /s/ M. Colleen Ryan
STEPHEN A. SCOTT
M. COLLEEN RYAN
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF OAKLAND, ALAMEDA COUNTY,
OAKLAND COLISEUM JOINT VENTURE and
SMG CORPORATION

18
19
20

ER

R NIA
FO

Spero

LI

Judge Jo

H

26

RT

25

ERED

seph C.

NO

24

Dated: 10/26/12

O ORD
IT IS S

A

23

UNIT
ED

22

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

S

21

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

27
28
413051

-2STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING - CASE NO. C12-02967