Axis Reinsurance Company v. Telekenex, Inc. et al
Filing
126
Amended ORDER regarding cross-motions for summary judgment.. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 12/10/2013. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
AXIS REINSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
v.
TELEKENEX, INC.; ANTHONY ZABIT;
KAREN SALAZAR; BRANDON CHANEY;
DEANNA CHANEY; MARK PRUDELL; JOY
PRUDELL; MARK RADFORD; NIKKI
RADFORD; JOSHUA SUMMERS; JULIA
SUMMERS; IXC HOLDINGS, INC.;
STRAITSHOT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.;
and STRAITSHOT RC, LLC,
18
Defendants.
19
) Case No. 12-2979 SC
)
) ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
) SUMMARY JUDGMENT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
20
21
Now pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary
22
judgment filed by Plaintiff Axis Reinsurance Company ("Plaintiff"),
23
on the one hand, and Defendants Brandon Chaney, Deanna Chaney, IXC
24
Holdings, Inc., Karen Salazar, Telekenex Inc., and Anthony Zabit
25
(collectively, the "Telekenex Defendants"), on the other hand.
26
Nos. 109, 120.
27
pending a decision on these cross-motions.
28
November 5, 2013, Plaintiff and the Telekenex Defendants filed a
The trial date for this matter has been vacated
ECF
ECF No. 13.
On
1
notice of settlement, indicating that they anticipate settling
2
their claims against one another within sixty days.
3
In the interim, the parties request that the Court delay ruling on
4
their cross-motions for summary judgment.
5
GRANTED.
6
statement updating the Court on the status of their settlement
7
negotiations by January 5, 2014.
ECF No. 124.
The parties' request is
Plaintiff and the Telekenex Defendants shall file a joint
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
Dated: December 10, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?