Carr v. Beverly Health and Rehabilitation Services, Inc.
Filing
33
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 30 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Andrew Carr Motion and CMC set for 11/9/12 at 1:30 p.m.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/11/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2012)
1 ALAN HARRIS (CA Bar No. 146079)
HARRIS & RUBLE
2 6424 Santa Monica Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90038
(323) 962-3777
3 Telephone: (323) 962-3004
Facsimile:
4 DAVID S. HARRIS (CA Bar No. 215224)
5 NORTH BAY LAW GROUP #2
116 E. Blithedale Avenue, Suite
California 94941-2024
6 Mill Valley, (415) 388-8788
Telephone:
7 Facsimile: (415) 388-8770
8 Attorneys for Plaintiff
ANDREW CARR
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13 ANDREW CARR, individually and on behalf
14 of all others similarly situated,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO
DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Plaintiff,
15
16
Case No.: 12-CV-02980-EMC
v.
AND
17 BEVERLY HEALTHSERVICES, INC.,
REHABILITATION
18
19
Courtroom:
Judge:
GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER - PETALUMA,
and DOES 1 to 50,
5
Hon. Edward M. Chen
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO DISMISS
AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
The parties hereby stipulate as follows:
2
WHEREAS, Defendant Beverly Health and Rehabilitation Services, Inc. filed a Motion to
3 Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(B)(6) (“Motion to Dismiss”), which has been fully-briefed by all
4 parties. The Motion to Dismiss is scheduled to be heard by the Court on September 14, 2012, at
5 1:30 p.m.;
6
WHEREAS, on September 6, 2012, the parties filed a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
7 Selecting ADR Process. Specifically, the parties stipulated to participating in Private ADR
8 through JAMS or a similar private mediator, which the parties are in the process of scheduling.
9 The parties have stipulated to holding the mediation before the date of the Case Management
10 Conference;
11
WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference is currently scheduled to take place on
12 October 26, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco, before the Honorable
13 Edward M. Chen; and
14
WHEREAS, the parties respectfully request that the Court continue the hearing on the
15 Motion to Dismiss and the Case Management Conference so that the parties may participate in
16 early mediation.
17
IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED that the hearing on the Motion to
18 Dismiss and the Case Management Conference shall be continued until November 9, 2012, at 1:30
19 p.m. in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco, if that date is convenient to the Court. The
20 parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement at least one week prior to the Case
21 Management Conference.
22
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
23
Respectfully submitted,
24 Date: September 6, 2012
25
NORTH BAY LAW GROUP
By
26
/s/
David S. Harris
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ANDREW CARR
27
28
-2-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO DISMISS
AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
2
Date: September 6, 2012
DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP
3
By
4
/s/
Carly Chu
Attorneys for Defendant
BEVERLY HEALTH AND
REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC.
5
6
7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
8
The parties shall complete mediation before November 9, 2012. The hearing on the
9 Motion to Dismiss and the Case Management Conference is continued to November 9, 2012 at
S
FO
R NIA
__________________________________
Honorable Edward M. Chen
United States District Court Judge
n
M. Che
Edward
Judge
ER
A
H
17
RT
16
NO
15
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
LI
11
13 DATED: September __, 2012
14
UNIT
ED
12
RT
U
O
10 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5. The parties shall file a JointDISTManagement Statement at least one
S Case RICT
TE
C
11 week prior to the Conference.
TA
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO DISMISS
AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?