Carr v. Beverly Health and Rehabilitation Services, Inc.

Filing 33

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 30 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Andrew Carr Motion and CMC set for 11/9/12 at 1:30 p.m.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/11/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2012)

Download PDF
1 ALAN HARRIS (CA Bar No. 146079) HARRIS & RUBLE 2 6424 Santa Monica Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90038 (323) 962-3777 3 Telephone: (323) 962-3004 Facsimile: 4 DAVID S. HARRIS (CA Bar No. 215224) 5 NORTH BAY LAW GROUP #2 116 E. Blithedale Avenue, Suite California 94941-2024 6 Mill Valley, (415) 388-8788 Telephone: 7 Facsimile: (415) 388-8770 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff ANDREW CARR 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 ANDREW CARR, individually and on behalf 14 of all others similarly situated, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Plaintiff, 15 16 Case No.: 12-CV-02980-EMC v. AND 17 BEVERLY HEALTHSERVICES, INC., REHABILITATION 18 19 Courtroom: Judge: GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER - PETALUMA, and DOES 1 to 50, 5 Hon. Edward M. Chen Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 The parties hereby stipulate as follows: 2 WHEREAS, Defendant Beverly Health and Rehabilitation Services, Inc. filed a Motion to 3 Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(B)(6) (“Motion to Dismiss”), which has been fully-briefed by all 4 parties. The Motion to Dismiss is scheduled to be heard by the Court on September 14, 2012, at 5 1:30 p.m.; 6 WHEREAS, on September 6, 2012, the parties filed a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 7 Selecting ADR Process. Specifically, the parties stipulated to participating in Private ADR 8 through JAMS or a similar private mediator, which the parties are in the process of scheduling. 9 The parties have stipulated to holding the mediation before the date of the Case Management 10 Conference; 11 WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference is currently scheduled to take place on 12 October 26, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco, before the Honorable 13 Edward M. Chen; and 14 WHEREAS, the parties respectfully request that the Court continue the hearing on the 15 Motion to Dismiss and the Case Management Conference so that the parties may participate in 16 early mediation. 17 IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED that the hearing on the Motion to 18 Dismiss and the Case Management Conference shall be continued until November 9, 2012, at 1:30 19 p.m. in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco, if that date is convenient to the Court. The 20 parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement at least one week prior to the Case 21 Management Conference. 22 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 23 Respectfully submitted, 24 Date: September 6, 2012 25 NORTH BAY LAW GROUP By 26 /s/ David S. Harris Attorneys for Plaintiff ANDREW CARR 27 28 -2- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 Date: September 6, 2012 DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP 3 By 4 /s/ Carly Chu Attorneys for Defendant BEVERLY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. 5 6 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 8 The parties shall complete mediation before November 9, 2012. The hearing on the 9 Motion to Dismiss and the Case Management Conference is continued to November 9, 2012 at S FO R NIA __________________________________ Honorable Edward M. Chen United States District Court Judge n M. Che Edward Judge ER A H 17 RT 16 NO 15 DERED O OR IT IS S LI 11 13 DATED: September __, 2012 14 UNIT ED 12 RT U O 10 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5. The parties shall file a JointDISTManagement Statement at least one S Case RICT TE C 11 week prior to the Conference. TA N D IS T IC T R OF C 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?