Carr v. Beverly Health and Rehabilitation Services, Inc.

Filing 41

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 40 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Andrew Carr, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 40 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO DIS MISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, 6 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(B)(6). Case Management Statement due by 4/25/2013. Case Management Conference set for 5/2/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 5/2/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/6/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2013)

Download PDF
1 ALAN HARRIS (CA Bar No. 146079) HARRIS & RUBLE 2 6424 Santa Monica Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90038 (323) 962-3777 3 Telephone: (323) 962-3004 Facsimile: 4 DAVID S. HARRIS (CA Bar No. 215224) 5 NORTH BAY LAW GROUP #2 116 E. Blithedale Avenue, Suite California 94941-2024 6 Mill Valley, (415) 388-8788 Telephone: 7 Facsimile: (415) 388-8770 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff ANDREW CARR 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 ANDREW CARR, individually and on behalf 14 of all others similarly situated, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Plaintiff, 15 16 Case No.: 12-CV-02980-EMC v. AND 17 BEVERLY HEALTHSERVICES, INC., REHABILITATION 18 19 Courtroom: Judge: GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER - PETALUMA, and DOES 1 to 50, 5 Hon. Edward M. Chen Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 The parties hereby stipulate as follows: 2 WHEREAS, Defendant Beverly Health and Rehabilitation Services, Inc. filed a Motion to 3 Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(B)(6) (“Motion to Dismiss”), which has been fully-briefed by all 4 parties; 5 WHEREAS, on February 27, 2013, prior to the Court conducting a hearing on the Motion 6 to Dismiss, the parties engaged in private mediation with Mr. Michael Loeb at JAMS in San 7 Francisco. At that time, progress was made but the parties were unable to settle the case. The 8 parties agreed, however, to engage in additional investigation and schedule a second mediation, 9 which will take place on or before April 5, 2013. 10 IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED, in order to allow the parties to 11 engage in additional fact finding and a second day of mediation with Mr. Loeb, the parties have 12 stipulated to continuing the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss and the Case Management 13 Conference until May 2, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco, if that date 14 is convenient to the Court. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement at least one 15 week prior to the Case Management Conference. 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 17 Respectfully submitted, 18 Date: March 5, 2013 19 HARRIS & RUBLE By 20 /s/ Alan Harris Attorneys for Plaintiff ANDREW CARR 21 22 23 Date: March 5, 2013 DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP 24 By 25 /s/ Carly Chu Attorneys for Defendant BEVERLY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. 26 27 28 -2- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 2 The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss and the Case Management Conference is continued 3 to May 2, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management 4 Statement at least one week prior to the Conference. DISTRI __________________________________ ERED Honorable Edward M.RD SO O Chen IT IS United States District Court Judge 8 11 A H ER LI RT 10 J FO NO 9 . Chen ward M udge Ed R NIA S UNIT ED 6 6 DATED: March__, 2013 7 CT C RT U O 5 ES AT T N D IS T IC T R OF C 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?