Robertson v. Citibank, NA et al

Filing 39

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Motion Hearing set for 3/1/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 1/14/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 LAMESHA ARLENA ROBERTSON, 10 Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 9 12 13 No. C 12-02996 JSW v. CITIBANK, NA, et al., ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Defendants. / 14 15 In mid-November of 2012, Defendants Pite Duncan, LLP, Michael J. Krahenbuhl, Esq., 16 Michael Steven W. Pite, Esq., and John Duncan, Esq. (“PD Defendants”) and Citibank, N.A., 17 Bank of America, N.A. and Recontrust Company, N.A. (“Bank Defendants”) filed motions to 18 dismiss. Those motions are scheduled to be heard on February 1, 2013. Pursuant to Northern 19 District Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiff’s oppositions to these two motions were due by November 20 30, 2012, at the latest. To date, Plaintiff has not file an opposition to either of these motions. 21 Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be 22 dismissed for failure to prosecute. If Plaintiff seeks to file a belated opposition brief, she must 23 file a request demonstrating good cause along with her proposed opposition. Plaintiff’s 24 response to this Order to Show Cause and any request to file a belated opposition brief must be 25 filed and served by no later than January 25, 2013. If Plaintiff seeks to file an opposition brief, 26 and if the Court grants that request, it shall afford the PD Defendants and the Bank Defendants 27 additional time to file a reply. The Court HEREBY CONTINUES the hearing on the PD 28 Defendants’ and the Bank Defendants’ motion to dismiss to March 1, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. 1 If Plaintiff fails to file a response to this Order to Show Cause by January 25, 2013 and 2 also fails to file a request to file a belated opposition brief by that date, the Court shall dismiss 3 this case for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), without 4 further notice to the Plaintiff. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 14, 2013 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 LAMESHA ARLENA ROBERTSON, Case Number: CV12-02996 JSW Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 6 7 v. 8 CITIBANK NA et al, 9 Defendant. / 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. 12 District Court, Northern District of California. 13 That on January 14, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter 14 listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 15 16 Lamesha Robertson 1215 Holly Burne Avenue 17 Menlo Park, CA 94025 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 14, 2013 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?