Robertson v. Citibank, NA et al

Filing 39

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Motion Hearing set for 3/1/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 1/14/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
LAMESHA ARLENA ROBERTSON,

10

Plaintiff,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

9

12
13

No. C 12-02996 JSW

v.
CITIBANK, NA, et al.,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Defendants.
/

14
15

In mid-November of 2012, Defendants Pite Duncan, LLP, Michael J. Krahenbuhl, Esq.,

16

Michael Steven W. Pite, Esq., and John Duncan, Esq. (“PD Defendants”) and Citibank, N.A.,

17

Bank of America, N.A. and Recontrust Company, N.A. (“Bank Defendants”) filed motions to

18

dismiss. Those motions are scheduled to be heard on February 1, 2013. Pursuant to Northern

19

District Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiff’s oppositions to these two motions were due by November

20

30, 2012, at the latest. To date, Plaintiff has not file an opposition to either of these motions.

21

Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be

22

dismissed for failure to prosecute. If Plaintiff seeks to file a belated opposition brief, she must

23

file a request demonstrating good cause along with her proposed opposition. Plaintiff’s

24

response to this Order to Show Cause and any request to file a belated opposition brief must be

25

filed and served by no later than January 25, 2013. If Plaintiff seeks to file an opposition brief,

26

and if the Court grants that request, it shall afford the PD Defendants and the Bank Defendants

27

additional time to file a reply. The Court HEREBY CONTINUES the hearing on the PD

28

Defendants’ and the Bank Defendants’ motion to dismiss to March 1, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.

1

If Plaintiff fails to file a response to this Order to Show Cause by January 25, 2013 and

2

also fails to file a request to file a belated opposition brief by that date, the Court shall dismiss

3

this case for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), without

4

further notice to the Plaintiff.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 14, 2013
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5
LAMESHA ARLENA ROBERTSON,

Case Number: CV12-02996 JSW

Plaintiff,

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

6
7
v.
8
CITIBANK NA et al,
9
Defendant.

/

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
12 District Court, Northern District of California.
13 That on January 14, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by
placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter
14 listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an
inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
15
16 Lamesha Robertson
1215 Holly Burne Avenue
17 Menlo Park, CA 94025
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: January 14, 2013
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk