Cancilla v. Ecolab, Inc.

Filing 163

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 160 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 161 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15

No. C 12-03001 CRB

NICK CANCILLA, et al.,

ORDER DENYING
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO
FILE UNDER SEAL

Plaintiffs,
v.
ECOLAB INC.,
Defendant.

/

16
17

Plaintiffs Nick Cancilla et al. have file two administrative motions to seal in this case.

18

See dkts. 160, 161. Both motions seek to seal documents marked “Confidential” by

19

Defendant Ecolab. Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) governs such

20

situations. Under that rule, Defendant had four days to file with the Court a declaration and

21

narrowly tailored sealing order supporting its confidentiality designation. Defendants filed

22

no such declaration. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal is

23

DENIED under Rule 79-5(e).

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

Dated: November 17, 2014
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27
28

G:\CRBALL\2012\3001\order re motions to seal.wpd