Cancilla v. Ecolab, Inc.

Filing 70

ORDER re 62 Stipulation, filed by Nick Cancilla, Motions terminated: 59 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Motion and Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Nick Cancilla. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/19/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2013)

Case3:12-cv-03001-CRB Document62 Filed05/31/13 Page1 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

JAMES M. FINBERG (SBN 114850)
EVE H. CERVANTEZ (SBN 164709)
CONNIE K. CHAN (SBN 284230)
ALTSHULER BERZON LLP
177 Post Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

JODY A. LANDRY, Bar No. 125743
[e-mail]
LINDSEY M. STEVENS, Bar No. 265700
[e-mail]
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
501 W. Broadway
Suite 900
San Diego, California 92101.3577
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 619.232.4302

STEVEN G. ZIEFF (SBN: 84222)
DAVID A. LOWE (SBN: 178811)
JOHN T. MULLAN (SBN: 221149)
RUDY, EXELROD, ZIEFF & LOWE, L.L.P.
351 California Street, Suite 700
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

ANDREW VOSS, Pro Hac Vice
[e-mail]
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
1300 IDS Center
80 South 8th Street,
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 612.630.9626
Attorneys for Defendant
ECOLAB, INC.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs NICK CANCILLA,
and all others similarly situated
[additional counsel for Plaintiffs on following
page]

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19

NICK CANCILLA, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

v.
ECOLAB, INC., a corporation,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CV 12-03001 CRB
STIPULATION PURSUANT TO FED.
R. CIV. P. 15(a)(2) REGARDING
FILING OF SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND TAKING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO FILE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT OFF CALENDAR;
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Date:
Time:
Ctrm.:
Judge:

n/a
n/a
6
Hon. Charles R. Breyer

Complaint Filed: June 11, 2012
Trial Date: Not Set

STIPULATION TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No. CV 12-03001 CRB

Case3:12-cv-03001-CRB Document62 Filed05/31/13 Page2 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

ROBERT S. NELSON (SBN 220984)
NELSON LAW GROUP
26 West Portal Avenue, Suite 1
San Francisco, CA 94127
[phone] (phone)
[phone] (fax)
Email: [e-mail]
TODD F. JACKSON (SBN 202598)
LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER
& JACKSON, P.C.
476 9th Street
Oakland, CA 94607
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
JUSTIN M. SWARTZ*
MOLLY BROOKS*
OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP
3 Park Avenue, 29th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
MICHAEL J.D. SWEENEY**
GETMAN & SWEENEY, PLLC
9 Paradies Lane
New Paltz, NY 12561
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs NICK CANCILLA,
and all others similarly situated
*Pro Hac Vice Application Forthcoming
**Pro Hac Vice Application Pending

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

Case3:12-cv-03001-CRB Document62 Filed05/31/13 Page3 of 4

1

STIPULATION

2

Plaintiff NICK CANCILLA (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant ECOLAB INC. (“Ecolab” or

3

“Defendant”), herein referred to collectively as the “Parties,” hereby stipulate, by and through

4

their respective attorneys of record, as follows:

5

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his original complaint in the above-captioned matter on June

6

11, 2012, and filed a First Amended Complaint on August 27, 2012 pursuant to the parties’

7

stipulation, solely to correct a technical error in the original complaint;

8
9

WHEREAS, pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party
may amend its pleading with the written consent of the opposing party;

10
11

WHEREAS, the Court has not yet set a deadline for amending the pleadings or adding
parties;

12
13

WHEREAS, Plaintiff proposes to file a Second Amended Complaint, which is attached
as Exhibit A to this Stipulation;

14
15

WHEREAS, Defendant does not object to the filing of Plaintiff’s proposed Second
Amended Complaint;

16
17

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that Defendant shall have twenty (20) days from the date
of filing of this Stipulation to file a responsive pleading to the Second Amended Complaint;

18
19

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that this Stipulation moots Plaintiff’s pending Motion for
Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, set for hearing on June 21, 2013;

20

The Parties hereby stipulate as follows:

21

1.

22

Exhibit A, which shall be deemed filed as of the date of filing of this Stipulation;

23
24

Plaintiff may file the proposed Second Amended Complaint, attached hereto as

2.

Defendant shall file its responsive pleading to the Second Amended Complaint no

later than twenty (20) days from the date of filing of this Stipulation;

25

3.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, currently set for

26

hearing on June 21, 2013, is rendered moot by this Stipulation and shall be taken off calendar.

27

///

28

///

3
STIPULATION TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No. CV 12-03001 CRB

Case3:12-cv-03001-CRB Document62 Filed05/31/13 Page4 of 4

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2
3

Dated: May 31, 2013
/s/ James M. Finberg
JAMES M. FINBERG
ALTSHULER BERZON LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
NICK CANCILLA

4
5
6
7
8

Dated: May 31, 2013
/s/ Lindsey M. Stevens
JODY A. LANDRY
LINDSEY M. STEVENS
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendant
ECOLAB INC.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15

S
UNIT
ED

RT

ER

H

21

R NIA

reyer

les R. B

LI

20

har
Judge C

June 19, 2013

22

A

19

DERED

FO

18

O OR
IT IS S

NO

17

RT
U
O

16

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No. CV 12-03001 CRB