Clancy v. The Bromley Tea Company
Filing
92
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 25, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2014)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
TONY CLANCY,
Case No. 12-cv-03003-JST
Plaintiff,
8
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v.
9
10
THE BROMLEY TEA COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
The Court, finding that Plaintiff had not met his burden of establishing subject-matter
13
jurisdiction, issued an Order to Show Cause why this action should not be dismissed. ECF No. 90.
14
Plaintiff Tony Clancy filed no response to this order, instead moving to dismiss this action without
15
prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ECF No. 91.
16
This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall close the file.
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: August 25, 2014
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
