Cuviello et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 17

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 16 TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT filed by N. Yu, J. Mitra, City and County of San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/1/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney DANNY CHOU, State Bar # 180240 Chief of Complex and Special Litigation ROBERT A. BONTA, State Bar # 202668 AILEEN M. McGRATH, State Bar # 280846 Deputy City Attorneys Fox Plaza 1390 Market Street, Seventh Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: (415) 554-4236 Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 E-Mail: aileen.mcgrath@sfgov.org 8 9 10 Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICER N. YU, SAN FRANCISCO PARK RANGER J. MITRA 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 JOSEPH P. CUVIELLO, DENIZ BOLBOL, AND ALEX FELSINGER, individually, Action filed: June 12, 2012 Plaintiffs, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Case No. CV 12-3034 EMC vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO RECREATION AND PARK DEPARTMENT, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICER N. YU, SAN FRANCISCO PARK RANGER J. MITRA and DOES 1-20, in their individual and official capacities, Jointly and Severally, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (Civil L.R. 6-1(a)) Trial Date: None Set Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order USDC No. CV 12 3034 EMC 1 c:\documents and settings\cdaly\desktop\cuviello stip re answer.doc 1 2 STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiffs Joseph P. Cuviello, Deniz Bolbol, and Alex Felsinger 3 ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Police Officer Nelson 4 Yu, and San Francisco Park Ranger Jose Mitra ("Defendants"), by and through their respective 5 counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the 6 Complaint be extended by 30 days, to and including September 7, 2012. 7 Dated: July 30, 2012 8 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney DANNY CHOU Chief of Complex and Special Litigation ROBERT A. BONTA AILEEN M. McGRATH Deputy City Attorneys 9 10 11 12 By: 13 /s/ Aileen M. McGrath AILEEN M. McGRATH Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICER N. YU, SAN FRANCISCO PARK RANGER J. MITRA 14 15 16 17 18 Dated: July 30, 2012 19 LAW OFFICE OF TRENT J. THORNLEY 20 By: 21 22 /s/ Trent J. Thornley TRENT J. THORNLEY Attorney for Plaintiff DENIZ BOLBOL 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order USDC No. CV 12 3034 EMC 2 c:\documents and settings\cdaly\desktop\cuviello stip re answer.doc 1 2 3 4 Date: July 30, 2012 MATT SPRINGMAN 5 6 7 /s/ Matt Springman MATT SPRINGMAN 8 Attorney for Plaintiff DENIZ BOLBOL 9 By: Dated: July 30, 2012 10 GONZALEZ & LEIGH LLP 11 By: 12 13 /s/ G. Whitney Leigh G. WHITNEY LEIGH Attorney for Plaintiff ALEX FELSINGER 14 15 Dated: July 30, 2012 16 JOSEPH P. CUVIELLO 17 18 By: 19 /s/ Joseph Cuviello JOSEPH P. CUVIELLO Plaintiff In Pro Se 20 21 22 *THE FILER OF THIS DOCUMENT ATTESTS THAT CONCURRENCE IN THE FILING OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM ALL SIGNATORIES 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order USDC No. CV 12 3034 EMC 3 c:\documents and settings\cdaly\desktop\cuviello stip re answer.doc ORDER 1 2 The time for Defendants City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Police Officer 3 Nelson Yu, and San Francisco Park Ranger Jose Mitra to answer or otherwise respond to the 4 Complaint is extended by 30 days, to and including September 7, 2012. S UNIT ED D RDERE EDWARD IT IS SO O M. CHEN United States District Judge 8 dward Judge E NO 9 RT ER 11 12 A H 10 n M. Che LI 7 R NIA DATED: RT U O 6 8/1/12 FO 5 S DISTRICT TE C TA N D IS T IC T R OF C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order USDC No. CV 12 3034 EMC 4 c:\documents and settings\cdaly\desktop\cuviello stip re answer.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?