Cuviello et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
96
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 95 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by N. Yu, San Francisco Recreation and Park Department, J. Mitra, City and County of San Francisco Case Management Statement due by 9/26/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 10/3/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/20/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
OWEN J. CLEMENTS, State Bar #141805
Chief of Complex and Special Litigation
AILEEN M. McGRATH, State Bar # 280846
Deputy City Attorneys
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, Seventh Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone:
(415) 554-4236
Facsimile:
(415) 554-3837
E-Mail:
aileen.mcgrath@sfgov.org
7
8
9
10
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO RECREATION AND PARK
DEPARTMENT, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICER N. YU, SAN FRANCISCO PARK
RANGER J. MITRA
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
JOSEPH P. CUVIELLO, DENIZ
BOLBOL, AND ALEX FELSINGER,
individually,
Plaintiffs,
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
vs.
Case No. CV 12-3034 EMC
STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND
TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO
RECREATION AND PARK
DEPARTMENT, SAN FRANCISCO
POLICE OFFICER N. YU, SAN
FRANCISCO PARK RANGER J.
MITRA and DOES 1-20, in their
individual and official capacities, Jointly
and Severally,
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order
USDC No. CV 12 3034 EMC
1
n:\cxlit\li2013\121412\00867183.doc
1
The schedule in this case currently requires Plaintiffs to file a Second Amended Complaint on
2
or before August 27, 2013. The case is also set for a further Case Management Conference on
3
August 29, 2013.
4
The parties in this case have reached a settlement, which is contingent upon approval by the
5
San Francisco Board of Supervisors. The ordinance providing for such approval is currently pending
6
before the Board of Supervisors. Because the Board is in summer recess, it will not act on that
7
approval before the month of September 2013.
8
The parties agree and stipulate to extending the time for Plaintiffs to file a Second Amended
9
Complaint to and including October 2, 2013. The parties further stipulate and request that this Court
10
continue the further Case Management Conference to October 3, 2013. The reason for the request is
11
to give the Board of Supervisors time to complete the approval process, which will obviate the need
12
for a Second Amended Complaint to be filed and will impact the further schedule of the case.
13
No other dates are currently set in this case. Therefore, the requested extensions will not
14
affect the schedule of this case.
15
Dated: August 19, 2013
16
DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
OWEN J. CLEMENTS
Chief of Complex and Special Litigation
AILEEN M. McGRATH
Deputy City Attorneys
17
18
19
By:
20
/s/ Aileen M. McGrath
AILEEN M. McGRATH
21
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN
FRANCISCO RECREATION AND PARK
DEPARTMENT, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE
OFFICER N. YU, SAN FRANCISCO PARK RANGER
J. MITRA
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order
USDC No. CV 12 3034 EMC
2
n:\cxlit\li2013\121412\00867183.doc
1
Date: August 19, 2013
MATT SPRINGMAN
2
3
4
/s/ Matt Springman
MATT SPRINGMAN
5
Attorney for Plaintiff DENIZ BOLBOL
6
By:
Dated: August 19, 2013
7
GONZALEZ & LEIGH LLP
8
By:
9
10
/s/ G. Whitney Leigh
G. WHITNEY LEIGH
Attorney for Plaintiff ALEX FELSINGER
11
12
Dated: August 19, 2013
13
JOSEPH P. CUVIELLO
14
15
By:
16
/s/ Joseph P. Cuviello
JOSEPH P. CUVIELLO
Plaintiff In Pro Se
17
18
19
*THE FILER OF THIS DOCUMENT ATTESTS THAT CONCURRENCE IN THE FILING OF
THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM ALL SIGNATORIES
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order
USDC No. CV 12 3034 EMC
3
n:\cxlit\li2013\121412\00867183.doc
PROPOSED ORDER
1
2
Good cause having been shown, the parties’ Stipulated Request to Extend Time to File
3
Second Amended Complaint and To Continue Case Management Conference is GRANTED. The
4
deadline for the Plaintiffs to file a Second Amended Complaint is October 2, 2013. The Further Case
5
Management Conference is reset from August 29, 2013 to October 3, 2013 at 10:30 a.m.
6
O
IT IS S
10
RT
ER
13
14
A
H
12
n
M. Che
LI
dward
Judge E
NO
11
R NIA
9
HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
United States ERED Judge
ORD District
FO
UNIT
ED
8
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
DATED:
S
7
8/20/13
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order
USDC No. CV 12 3034 EMC
4
n:\cxlit\li2013\121412\00867183.doc
PROOF OF SERVICE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
I, Catheryn M. Daly, declare as follows:
I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the aboveentitled action. I am employed at the City Attorney’s Office of San Francisco, Fox Plaza Building,
1390 Market Street, Seventh Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102.
On August 19, 2013, I served the following document(s):
STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
on the following persons at the locations specified:
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
JOSEPH P. CUVIELLO
P.O. Box 2834
Redwood City, CA 94064
Telephone: 650-654-9955
Email: pcuvie@gmail.com
Plaintiff in Pro Se
in the manner indicated below:
BY UNITED STATES MAIL: Following ordinary business practices, I sealed true and correct copies of
the above documents in addressed envelope(s) and placed them at my workplace for collection and mailing with
the United States Postal Service. I am readily familiar with the practices of the San Francisco City Attorney's
Office for collecting and processing mail. In the ordinary course of business, the sealed envelope(s) that I placed
for collection would be deposited, postage prepaid, with the United States Postal Service that same day.
I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Executed August 19, 2013, at San Francisco, California.
/s/ Catheryn M. Daly
Catheryn M. Daly
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order
USDC No. CV 12 3034 EMC
5
n:\cxlit\li2013\121412\00867183.doc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?