Bridge Partners v. Citibank, N.A. et al
Filing
48
ORDER REGARDING REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE, EXHIBIT TWO. Signed by Judge Alsup on July 17, 2012. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2012)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
BRIDGE PARTNERS, a California
Corporation,
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. C 12-03048 WHA
ORDER REGARDING REQUEST FOR
JUDICIAL NOTICE, EXHIBIT TWO
v.
15
CITIBANK N.A., a national banking
association, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK,
N.A., a national banking association, and
DOES 1–50, inclusive
16
Defendants.
14
/
17
18
The Court has found many of the pages in exhibit two, appended to the request for
19
judicial notice in support of defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank’s opposition, to be illegible.
20
Please re-file an electronic version of exhibit two and submit a new chamber’s copy of the same
21
by NOON ON JULY 17, 2012.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: July 16, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
