Jones v. Vivas et al
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 03/18/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2013)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
No. C-12-3062 TEH (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
DOCTOR VIVAS, et al.,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
On November 6, 2012, this civil rights action was
dismissed under Civil Local Rule 3-11(b) because sixty days had
passed since the Court’s mail to Plaintiff had been returned as
undeliverable and the Court had not received a written communication
from him indicating a current address.
returned as undeliverable was an Order to Show Cause that was filed
on August 9, 2012.
“objection” to the dismissal order, asking that his case be re-
opened and the Order to Show cause be reinstated.
stated that, when he filed his complaint in April 2012, he was
housed in the San Francisco County Jail, but he was released on
October 22, 2012 and that his new address was: Monroe Jones; General
Delivery; San Francisco, California, 94142.
The mail that was
On November 14, 2012, Plaintiff filed an
On November 20, 2012, the Court issued an Order Reopening
the Case and Re-instating the Order to Show Cause.
an abundance of caution, the Court ordered the Clerk of the Court to
send a copy of the Order Reopening the Case and the Order to Show
Cause to Plaintiff’s new address and to his address at the San
Francisco County Jail.
On November 29, 2012, the mail that was sent to Plaintiff
at the San Francisco County Jail was returned as undeliverable.
change of address providing the same address he had given in his
On December 18, 2012, Plaintiff filed a notice of
objection: Monroe Jones; General Delivery; San Francisco,
had been sent to Plaintiff at his General Delivery address was
returned as undeliverable.
On December 26, 2012, the mail that
Because sixty days have passed since the Court’s mail to
Plaintiff was returned as undeliverable, and the Court has received
no further written communication from Plaintiff indicating a current
address, the case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Civil
Local Rule 3-11(b).
The Clerk shall close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge
G:\PRO-SE\TEH\CR.12\Jones 12-3062-Dis 2x Ret'd Mail .wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?