Melomet v. City and County of San Francisco Human Services Agency
Filing
36
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 35 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation to Dismissal of Action; [Proposed] Order filed by Andrew Melomet. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 10/29/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2013)
Case3:12-cv-03101-EDL Document35 Filed10/29/13 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
RICHARD M. ROGERS, #045843
LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROGERS
100 Bush Street, #1980
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
415/981-9788
Facsimile:
415/981-9798
Email:
RogersRMR@aol.com
4
Attorneys for Plaintiff
5
ANDREW MELOMET
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ANDREW MELOMET,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO )
HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, AND DOES )
)
1 THROUGH 5, INCLUSIVE,
)
)
Defendants.
)
Case No.: C12-03101 EDL
Case filed:
Case removed:
Case reassigned:
Trial date:
02/02/12
06/15/12
10/05/12, 11/13/12
TBA
STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF
ACTION; ORDER____________
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. C12-03101 EDL -- STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
MELOMET/
DISMISS.STIP
1
Case3:12-cv-03101-EDL Document35 Filed10/29/13 Page2 of 2
1
2
Pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1), the parties hereto stipulate to a dismissal of this action
with prejudice, pursuant to a Settlement Agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
3
4
Dated:___ _07/18/13___________
LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROGERS
5
6
By:_____/s/ Richard M. Rogers________________
RICHARD M. ROGERS
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7
8
9
Dated: __10/28/13____________
DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
ELIZABETH S. SALVESON
Chief Labor Attorney
ANDREW GSCHWIND
Deputy City Attorney
10
11
12
13
14
By:_/s/ Andrew Gschwind____________________
ANDREW GSCHWIND
Attorneys for Defendant
15
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
20
Dated: 10/29/13
By:
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. C12-03101 EDL -- STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
MELOMET/
DISMISS.STIP
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?