Lingenfelter v. Astrue
Filing
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL re 24 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Jay S. Lingenfelter. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 15, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2013)
1
HARVEY P. SACKETT
2
3
4
5
1055 Lincoln Avenue
Post Office Box 5025
San Jose, California 95150-5025
Telephone: (408) 295-7755
Facsimile: (408) 295-7444
6
7
8
Attorney for Plaintiff
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
JAY S. LINGENFELTER,
Plaintiff,
14
15
v.
16
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,1
Acting Commissioner,
Social Security Administration,
17
18
Defendant.
19
) No.: 3:12-cv-03114- JST
)
)
)
) STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
) DISMISSAL
)
)
)
)
)
)
20
Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that this
21
22
matter be dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. Each party shall bear their own attorney's
23
fees and costs.
24
25
1
26
27
28
Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 14, 2013.
Pursuant to Rule 25(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin should be
substituted for Commissioner Michael J. Astrue as Defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken
to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
ยง 405(g).
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL
MELINDA L. HAAG
United States Attorney
1
2
3
4
Dated: April 15, 2013
/s/
ANNABELLE J. YANG
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Social Security Administration
Attorney for the Defendant
Dated: April 15, 2013
5
/s/
HARVEY P. SACKETT
Attorney for Plaintiff
JAY S. LINGENFELTER
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
Dated: April 15, 2013
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL
____________________________
HON. JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?