McDowell et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
9
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSE AND INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CLERK. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 7/13/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
FRANK AND DEBORAH MCDOWELL,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
No. C 12-03192 JSW
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
Defendants.
14
ORDER GRANTING
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS AND
DENYING MOTION FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND
INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CLERK
(Docket Nos. 2, 3)
/
15
16
On June 20, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint alleging that Defendant, Plaintiffs’
17
employer, have discriminated against them. On that same date, Plaintiffs filed an application to
18
proceed in forma pauperis. Having considered the application, the Court finds good cause to
19
grant the request. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma
20
pauperis is GRANTED and that the Clerk shall issue the summons. IT IS FURTHER
21
ORDERED that the U.S. Marshal for the Northern District of California serve, without
22
prepayment of fees, a copy of the complaint, any amendments, scheduling orders, attachments,
23
Plaintiffs’ affidavit and this Order upon the Defendant
24
Plaintiffs also move for appointment of counsel. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1),
25
a court may appoint counsel for a plaintiff “in such circumstances as the court may deem just.”
26
There are three relevant factors to consider in determining “whether to appoint counsel: (1) the
27
plaintiff’s financial resources; (2) the efforts made by the plaintiff to secure counsel on his or
28
her own; and (3) the merit of the plaintiff’s claim.” Johnson v. United States Treasury
1
Department, 27 F.3d 415, 416-17 (9th Cir. 1994). Ultimately, the decision on whether to
2
appoint counsel is a matter left to the Court’s discretion. Id. at 416.
3
Although this Court has determined that Plaintiffs qualify to proceed in forma pauperis,
4
Plaintiffs have not identified what efforts - if any - they have made to secure counsel on their
5
own behalf. In addition, at this stage, the Court cannot evaluate whether Plaintiffs’ claim has
6
merit. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel is DENIED WITHOUT
7
PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs may renew their request in the future, but they must file a properly
8
noticed motion for appointment of counsel.
9
The Court HEREBY ADVISES Plaintiffs that the Handbook for Pro Se Litigants, which
contains helpful information about proceeding without an attorney, is available through the
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Court’s website or in the Clerk’s office. The Court also advises Plaintiffs that they also may
12
wish to seek assistance from the Legal Help Center. Plaintiffs may call the Legal Help Center
13
at 415-782-9000, extension 8657, or sign up on the 15th Floor of the Courthouse, Room 2796,
14
for a free appointment with an attorney who may be able to provide basic legal help, but not
15
legal representation.
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
Dated: July 13, 2012
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
FRANK AND DEBORAH MCDOWELL
et al,
8
9
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Plaintiff,
7
Case Number: CV12-03192 JSW
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO et al,
10
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
Defendant.
11
12
13
14
15
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on July 13, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office
delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
16
17
18
19
Deborah McDowell
2800 Bellwort Court
Antioch, CA 94531
21
Frank McDowell
2800 Bellwort Court
Antioch, CA 94531
22
Dated: July 13, 2012
20
23
24
25
26
27
28
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?