Shierry v. Facebook, Inc. et al

Filing 21

RELATED CASE ORDER. The following cases are related: Spatz, et al. v. Facebook, Inc., et al., C 12-2662 MMC, Offner v. Facebook, Inc., et al., C 12-2666 MMC, Chang, et al. v. Facebook, Inc., et al., C 12-2680, Gregory v. Facebook, Inc., et al., C 12-2815 MMC, Lapin v. Facebook, Inc., et al., C 12-3195 SBA, DeMois. Jr. v. Facebook, Inc. et al., C 12-3196 LHK, Pilgram v. Facebook, Inc., et al., C 12-3197 EMC, Alfonso v. Facebook, Inc., et al., C 12-3198 YGR, Lazar v. Facebook, Inc., et al., C 12-3199 JSW, Shierry v. Facebook, Inc., et al. C 12-3200 RS, Cuker, et al. v. Facebook, Inc., et al., C 12-3201 CW, Lieber v. Facebook, Inc., et al., C 12-3202 EMC, Stokes v. Facebook, Inc., et al., C 12-3203 YGR. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 28, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2012)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RELATED CASE ORDER
An Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related has
been filed, requesting a determination as to whether the following cases are related
within the meaning of Civil L.R. 3-12(a):
C 12-2662 MMC
C 12-2666 MMC
C 12-2680 MMC
C 12-2815 MMC
C 12-3195 SBA
C 12-3196 LHK
C 12-3197 EMC
C 12-3198 YGR
C 12-3199 JSW
C 12-3200 RS
C 12-3201 CW
C 12-3202 EMC
C 12-3203 YGR

Spatz, et al. v. Facebook, Inc., et al.
Offner v. Facebook, Inc., et al.
Chang, et al. v. Facebook, Inc., et al.
Gregory v. Facebook, Inc., et al.
Lapin v. Facebook, Inc., et al.
DeMois. Jr. v. Facebook, Inc. et al.
Pilgram v. Facebook, Inc., et al.
Alfonso v. Facebook, Inc., et al.
Lazar v. Facebook, Inc., et al.
Shierry v. Facebook, Inc., et al.
Cuker, et al. v. Facebook, Inc., et al.
Lieber v. Facebook, Inc., et al.
Stokes v. Facebook, Inc., et al.

On the basis of the material submitted to the Court, as the Judge assigned to the
earliest filed case, I find that the cases:
[

] ARE NOT RELATED as defined by Civil L.R. 3-12(a).

[ X ] ARE RELATED as defined by Civil L.R. 3-12(a).
Counsel are instructed that all future filings in the reassigned cases are to
bear the initials MMC immediately after the case number. Any case management
conference in the reassigned cases will be rescheduled by the Court. Any dates for
hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be re-noticed by the moving party before
the undersigned; any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules remain in effect; and any
deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern, except dates for
appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the undersigned.

DATED: June 28, 2012
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge