Mathews et al v. City of Oakland Police Department et al

Filing 102

ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 12/9/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
SPRING MATHEWS, et al.,

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

13
14

Plaintiffs,

No. C 12-03235 JCS (LB)
ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE

v.
CITY OF OAKLAND POLICE
DEPARTMENT, et al.,

15
16

Defendants.
___________________________________/

17
The parties have a settlement conference set for December 16, 2013. The settlement statements
18
omit the following information required by the court’s order regarding the content of statements.
19
See ECF No. 92. The court orders that the information must be provided by 2:00 p.m. on the second
20
business day (December 11, 2013) from the date of this order. Counsel may email the information
21
to the court’s orders box at [e-mail].
22
Plaintiffs did not provide a statement of the relief sought, including an itemization of damages
23
and any non-monetary relief sought. Plaintiffs also did not provide a list of the names, titles, and
24
positions of the persons attending the settlement conference. Plaintiffs also did not provide (in a
25
confidential statement or otherwise) a statement of the litigation costs and attorney’s fees to date and
26
estimated through trial. Plaintiffs are directed to re-read the court’s November 21, 2013 order in
27
which the court describes the information required to be included in settlement conference
28
statements. See ECF No. 92.
ORDER (C12-03235 JCS (LB))

1

Plaintiffs did not make a current demand and state it in the settlement conference statement.

2

Plaintiffs must do so. According to Defendants’ statement, Plaintiffs previously made a demand, but

3

it is not clear when that demand was made and whether it is current, and in any case Defendants did

4

not provide their respond to it in their settlement conference statement

5
6

Defendants must respond to Plaintiff’s demand by 5:00 p.m. on the second business day
(December 11, 2013) after receipt of the demand and must simultaneously notify the court.

7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8

Dated: December 9, 2013
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge

9
10

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER (C12-03235 JCS (LB))

2