Mathews et al v. City of Oakland Police Department et al

Filing 152

Court's Proposed Verdict Form. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on August 1, 2014. (jcslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SPRING MATHEWS, et al., Case No. 12-cv-03235-JCS Plaintiffs, 8 v. COURT'S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 CITY OF OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 1, 2014 ______________________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO United States Magistrate Judge VERDICT FORM 1 2 1. Do you find that Plaintiffs proved by a preponderance of evidence that Officer Richard 3 McNeely acted objectively unreasonably in using lethal force? 4 ____Yes ____No 5 6 7 8 If your answer to Question 1 is “Yes,” then proceed to and answer Questions 2-5. If your answer to Question 1 is “No,” then stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form. 9 2. What are Martin Flenaugh, II’s estate’s damages, if any? a. Economic Damages $____________ 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 b. Noneconomic Damages $____________ 12 c. Punitive Damages $____________ 13 Total Damages (a + b + c) $____________ 14 3. What are Martin Flenaugh, Sr.’s damages, if any? 15 a. Economic Damages $____________ 16 b. Noneconomic Damages $____________ 17 Total Damages (a + b) $____________ 18 4. What are Spring Mathews’ damages, if any? 19 a. Economic Damages $____________ 20 b. Noneconomic Damages $____________ 21 Total Damages (a + b) $____________ 22 5. What are Kamarty Flenaugh’s damages, if any? 23 a. Economic Damages $____________ 24 b. Noneconomic Damages $____________ 25 Total Damages (a + b) $____________ 26 Presiding Juror (sign): _____________________________ 27 Presiding Juror (print): _____________________________ 28 Date: _____________________________ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?