Mathews et al v. City of Oakland Police Department et al

Filing 94

ORDER AMENDING 93 re 90 MOTION in Limine filed by Spring Mathews. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on November 21, 2013. (jcslc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2013)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

SPRING MATHEWS, et al.,

Case No. 12-cv-03235-JCS

Plaintiffs,
8
v.

AMENDED ORDER STRIKING
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS IN LIMINE

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

CITY OF OAKLAND POLICE
DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 90, 93

Defendants.

12
13

Earlier today, the Court issued an order striking Plaintiffs’ improperly filed motions in

14

limine. See Dkt. No. 93 (striking Dkt. No. 90). Those motions remain stricken for the reasons

15

stated in that order. However, the Court issues this amended order to acknowledge that it

16

mistakenly cited the date of the Final Pretrial Conference as December 13, 2013 when it has been

17

moved to December 9, 2013. See Dkt. No. 78. Accordingly, the parties’ motions in limine were

18

due on November 19, 2013. See Further Case Management and Pretrial Order (Jury) ¶ V.A.5

19

(paired sets should be filed “at least twenty (20) calendar days before the conference”).

20

Nonetheless, the Court will consider motions in limine if they are properly filed with oppositions

21

no later than tomorrow, November 22, 2013.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 21, 2013
______________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
United States Magistrate Judge