Hernandez v. Taqueria El Grullense et al
Filing
59
ORDER RE CONSENT DECREE AND PROPOSED ORDER by Hon. William Alsup denying 58 Stipulation.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
GERARDO HERNANDEZ,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
No. C 12-03257 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER RE CONSENT DECREE
AND PROPOSED ORDER
TAQUERIA EL GRULLENSE; JUAN
FRANCISCO GAMEZ GARCIA dba
TAQUERIA EL GRULLENSE; OSCAR PANGCHENG LIU; CHUCHING KUO LIU; OSCAR
PANGCHENG LIU AND CHU-CHING KUO
LIU, Co-Trustees for the Liu Family Trust, dated
September 26, 2008; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive,
Defendants.
/
18
19
In this action brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the parties have
20
submitted a consent decree and proposed order, captioned “consent decree and [proposed] order
21
as to injunctive relief and damages only.” The consent decree provides for defendants to make
22
certain modifications to the facility in question, including modifications that are not set to be
23
completed until December 2013. It further states that “the Parties have not reached any
24
agreement regarding Plaintiff’s claims for damages, attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, and
25
costs. These matters will be the subject of future negotiation or litigation as necessary. The
26
Parties jointly stipulate and request that the Court not dismiss the case in its entirety as
27
these issues remain unresolved.” The consent decree also does not appear to address defendants
28
and cross-claimants’ claims against Rafael Guerrero, Juan Francisco Gamez Garcia, and
Taqueria El Grullense.
1
2
The parties proposed consent decree and order is premature and incomplete.
Accordingly, the proposed order is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: April 22, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?