Be In, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 40

Proposed Order re 37 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by Be In, Inc.. (KatieLynn, Townsend) (Filed on 4/30/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
S. ASHLIE BERINGER, SBN 263977
[e-mail]
1881 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.849.5333
WAYNE BARSKY, SBN 116732
[e-mail]
KATIELYNN TOWNSEND, SBN 254321
[e-mail]
2029 Century Park East
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 310.551.8741
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BE IN, INC., a New York corporation

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN JOSE DIVISION

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

BE IN, INC., a New York corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
GOOGLE, INC., a California corporation,
RICHARD ROBINSON, and DOES 1 through
3, inclusive,
Defendants.

CASE NO. 5:12-CV-03373-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Date:
Time:
Dept:
Judge:

September 26, 2013
1:30 p.m.
Courtroom 8, Fourth Floor
Hon. Lucy H. Koh

Date Comp. Filed: June 28, 2012
Trial Date: None set.

23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No. 5:12-CV-03373-LHK

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Having considered Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File its Second Amended Complaint and

3

Defendants’ response thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and that

4

Plaintiff file its Second Amended Complaint forthwith.

5
6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: _________, 2013
________________________________________
Hon. Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No. 5:12-CV-03373-LHK