Be In, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 5

STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT filed by Google Inc., Richard Robinson. (Graves, Charles) (Filed on 7/16/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

COLLEEN BAL, State Bar No. 167637
CHARLES TAIT GRAVES, State Bar No. 197923
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
One Market Plaza
Spear Tower, Suite 3300
San Francisco, California 94105-1126
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
Google Inc. and Richard Robinson

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
11
BE IN, INC., a New York Corporation,
12
13
14
15
16
17

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
GOOGLE INC., a California corporation;
)
RICHARD ROBINSON, an individual, and Does )
1 through 3 inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO.: CV-12-3373

Case No.: CV-12-3373
STIPULATION EXTENDING
DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT

1

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed and served a complaint against defendants Google Inc. and

2

Richard Robinson (“Defendants”) for causes of action alleging copyright infringement, trade

3

dress infringement, misappropriation of trade secrets, and civil conspiracy;

4

WHEREAS, Northern District of California Local Rule 6-1(a) allows the parties to

5

stipulate without a Court order to extend the time period in which a responsive pleading must be

6

filed; and

7
8
9

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to an extension of time for Defendants to file a
response to Plaintiff’s complaint until August 16, 2012;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that:

10

1.

Defendants shall respond to the complaint no later than August 16, 2012.

11

2.

If one or both Defendants respond to the complaint with a motion, Defendant(s)

12

shall agree to give Plaintiff an extension of time to respond to any such motion up to the same

13

length of time as Plaintiff has given Defendants to respond to the complaint.

14

3.

This stipulation is without prejudice to the rights, claims, or defenses of any party.

15

4.

This is the first time modification in the case, and the change will not alter the

16

date of any event or any deadline already affixed by Court order.

17
18

Dated: July 16, 2012
/s/ Charles T. Graves
Colleen Bal
Charles Tait Graves
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

19
20
21

Attorneys for Defendants
Google Inc. and Richard Robinson

22
23

Dated: July 16, 2012
/s/ Joseph E. Addiego III
Joseph E. Addiego III
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
William E. Wallace III (pro hac vice application pending)
Ian A. Taronji (pro hac vice application pending)
CLIFFORD CHANCE US LLP

24
25
26
27

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Be In, Inc.

28
STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO.: CV-12-3373

-1-

1
2
3

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
I, Charles T. Graves, hereby attest that concurrences in the filing of this document
have been obtained from each of the signatories.

4
5
6

/s/ Charles T. Graves
Charles Tait Graves

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’
TIME TO RESPOND TO CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
CASE NO.: 3:12-cv-00225-SC

-2-

4813285_1