Doe v. Hamburg et al
Filing
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 19 to Extend Defendants' Time to Respond to the Complaint filed by Margaret Hamburg, Kathleen Sebelius. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/7/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
STUART F. DELERY
Acting Assistant Attorney General
MAAME EWUSI-MENSAH FRIMPONG
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
MICHAEL S. BLUME
Director
RICHARD GOLDBERG
Assistant Director
SANG H. LEE (DCB – 985267)
Trial Attorney
Consumer Protection Branch
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 386
Washington, DC 20044
Tel: (202) 532-4793
Fax: (202) 514-8742
Email: Sang.H.Lee@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Defendants
Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D., Commissioner of Food and Drugs, and Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary of Health and Human Services
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
JANE DOE
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff,
vs.
MARGARET A. HAMBURG, M.D.,
in her official capacity as Commissioner,
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
21
and
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS,
in her official capacity as Secretary,
U.S. Dep’t of Health and Human Services,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case Number: C 12-03412 (EMC)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’
TIME TO RESPOND TO THE
COMPLAINT
WHEREAS, Plaintiff JANE DOE (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendants
MARGARET A. HAMBURG, M.D., in her official capacity as Commissioner, U.S. Food and
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
1
Drug Administration, and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary, U.S.
2
Department of Health and Human Services (“Defendants”) on or about July 2, 2012, in this
3
Court;
4
WHEREAS, Plaintiff served the Complaint on Defendants via certified mail on July 11,
5
2012, and absent an extension of time, the deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise
6
respond to the Complaint is September 10, 2012;
7
WHEREAS, Civil L.R. 6-1(a) of the United States District Court for the Northern District
8
of California provides that the parties may stipulate to extend the time within which to answer or
9
otherwise respond to the complaint without a Court order, provided the change will not alter the
10
date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order; and
11
12
13
WHEREAS, there have been no prior stipulations or requests for extension of time to
answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties that Defendants may have an
14
extension of three weeks to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint, up to and including
15
October 1, 2012.
16
This extension of time will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by
17
Court order.
18
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
19
Dated: September 6, 2012
BY: ____/s/ SHL______________
Sang H. Lee
Attorney for Defendants
Dated: September 6, 2012
BY: ____/s/ ADA______________
Amber D. Abbasi
Attorney for Plaintiff
20
21
23
24
S
RT
U
O
9/7
Dated: ______________, 2012
NO
RT
2
dward
Judge E
n
M. Che
FO
28
R NIA
_____________________________
ED
Hon. EdwardO ORDER
S S M. Chen
IT I
United States District Judge
27
LI
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
UNIT
ED
25
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
H
ER
A
22
N
F
C
ECF ATTESTATION
1
2
I, Sang H. Lee, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file
3
this Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend Defendants’ Time to Response to the Complaint.
4
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i), I hereby attest that Amber D. Abbasi, counsel for Plaintiff, JANE
5
DOE, has concurred in this filing.
6
7
_______________________
Sang H. Lee
Attorney for Defendants
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?