Overture Networks, Inc-v-Micron Technology, Inc

Filing 29

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/1/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2012)

1
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

Overture Networks, Inc,

6
7
8

Plaintiff,

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND
PRETRIAL MATTERS

v.
Micron Technology, Inc,

9

Defendant.

10

/

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

No. CV12-03439 JSW

12
Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case
13
Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further
14
ORDERED that:
15
A.

DATES

16
Jury Trial Date: 11/4/2013, at 8:00 a.m., 7 day estimate
17
Jury Selection: 10/30/2013 at 8:00 a.m.
18
Pretrial Conference: Monday, 10/15/2013, at 2:00 p.m.
19
Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, 9/6/2013, 9:00 a.m.
20
Last Day for Expert Discovery: 8/30/2013
21
Last Day for Expert Disclosure: 7/19/2013
22
Close of Non-expert Discovery: 5/31/2013
23
24
B.

DISCOVERY

25
The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to
26
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses
27
pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of
28
non-expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all
supplementation has been completed.

1

C.

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

2

By agreement of the parties, this matter is referred to private ADR, to be completed by

3

November 30, 2012. The parties shall promptly notify the Court whether the case is resolved.

4

D.

PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER

5

No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its

6

own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b)

7

without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline

8

contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties

9

may not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the
date of this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

a change in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule

12

that the Court will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are

13

specifically set by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain

14

leave of Court.

15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16
Dated: October 1, 2012
17

JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2