David v. Geithner

Filing 27

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S LETTER AND ATTACHED DOCUMENTS; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK; NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF. The Clerk of Court is directed to return to plaintiff (1) a two-page document issued by the Michigan Department of Treasury and titled " Final Demand for Payment"; and (2) a three-page document issued by the Internal Revenue Service and titled "Notice of Intent to Levy." Plaintiff is advised that the Court will not accept for filing in the instant action any further copies of correspondence from tax agencies, and that any such correspondence will be returned to plaintiff in accordance with the instant order. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 23, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11

MICHAEL DAVID,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14

No. C-12-3442 MMC
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S LETTER AND
ATTACHED DOCUMENTS; DIRECTIONS
TO CLERK; NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF

v.
TIMOTHY FRANZ GEITHNER,
Defendant.

15

/

16
17

By order filed September 5, 2012, the Court dismissed the above-titled action

18

without leave to amend. Thereafter, also on September 5, 2012, the Clerk of Court entered

19

judgment on the Court’s order of dismissal.

20

On December 9, 2013, the Clerk of Court filed a letter from plaintiff along with the

21

two documents attached thereto, which documents plaintiff characterizes as “evidence,”

22

specifically: (1) a two-page document issued by the Michigan Department of Treasury and

23

titled “Final Demand for Payment”; and (2) a three-page document issued by the Internal

24

Revenue Service and titled “Notice of Intent to Levy.”1

25
26

The above-titled action has been closed for well over a year, in light of the judgment.
Accordingly, plaintiff’s above-referenced submission is hereby STRICKEN from the record,

27
28

1

Each page of said documents bears the handwritten notation “Refusal for Cause,”
which, the Court assumes, was added by plaintiff.

1
2

and the Clerk of Court is hereby DIRECTED to return said documents to plaintiff.
Further, the Court notes that plaintiff has previously filed and/or attempted to file with

3

the Clerk of Court similar correspondence from state and federal tax agencies. Plaintiff is

4

hereby ADVISED that the Court will not accept for filing in the instant action any further

5

copies of correspondence from tax agencies, and that any such correspondence will be

6

returned to plaintiff in accordance with the instant order.

7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

Dated: December 23, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2