Moffett v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
Filing
43
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Moffett is ORDERED to file any opposition to 40 Motion for Summary Judgment by April 5, 2016 along with an accompanying declaration explaining why the brief was not timely filed. Failure to submit an opposition will result in the Court considering the motion solely on Zimmer's papers. In the event Moffett files an opposition brief, Zimmer may file its reply brief by April 12, 2016. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 04/01/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JOHN MOFFETT,
Case No. 12-cv-03445-WHO
Plaintiff,
8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
Re: Dkt. No. 40
9
10
ZIMMER, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
On March 10, 2016, defendants Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. Wilson/Phillips
13
Holdings, Inc., a/k/a Zimmer Wilson Phillips, and Zimmer Orthopedic Surgical Products, Inc.,
14
n/k/a Zimmer Surgical, Inc. (collectively “Zimmer”) filed a motion for summary judgment. Dkt.
15
No. 40. Plaintiff John Moffett’s opposition was due on March 24, 2016. As of the date of this
16
Order, no opposition brief has been filed.
17
Accordingly, Moffett is ORDERED to file any opposition by April 5, 2016 along with an
18
accompanying declaration explaining why the brief was not timely filed. Failure to submit an
19
opposition will result in the Court considering the motion solely on Zimmer’s papers. In the event
20
Moffett files an opposition brief, Zimmer may file its reply brief by April 12, 2016.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 1, 2016
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?