Evans v. Carrows Restaurants Inc. et al

Filing 15

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CARROWS RESTAURANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 9/11/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Tanya Moore, Esq. SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Janice Evans 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 17 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) vs. ) CARROWS RESTAURANTS INC., ) ) BERETTA INVESTMENTS GROUP, a CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 12 13 14 15 16 JANICE EVANS, No. 3:12-CV-03452-JCS STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CARROWS RESTAURANTS INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Stipulation for Extension of Time for Carrows Restaurants Inc. to Respond to Complaint Page 1 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Janice Evans and Defendant 2 Carrows Restaurants Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant 3 to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a) and Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendant may have to and 4 including September 20, 2012 to file a responsive pleading in this matter. This extension of 5 time is Defendant’s first extension and does not alter the date of any event or any deadline 6 already fixed by Court order. 7 Date: September 11, 2012 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 8 /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorneys for Plaintiff Janice Evans 9 10 11 12 Date: September 11, 2012 /s/ Luciana P. O’Brien Luciana P. O’Brien, Attorney for Carrows Restaurants Inc. 13 14 S ER R NIA ero FO Sp seph C. LI Judge Jo H 20 RT 19 NO 18 ERED O ORD IT IS S A 17 Dated: 9/11/12 UNIT ED 16 RT U O 15 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T N F D IS T IC T O R C 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation for Extension of Time for Carrows Restaurants Inc. to Respond to Complaint Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?