Heatherly et al v. Sushi Zoo Corporation et al
Filing
8
ORDER by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte terminating 5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
DAREN HEATHERLY,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
No. C -12-03458 EDL
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S
“NEED EXTENSION MORE TIME FOR
CORRECTION”
v.
SUSHI ZOO CO.,
Defendant.
15
/
16
Plaintiff filed this action on July 2, 2012, alleging, among other things, denial of right of
17
18
access by a public accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §
19
12101, et seq. On August 1, 2012, Plaintiff filed a consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. When
20
this case was filed, the Court issued a scheduling order for cases asserting denial of right of access
21
under the ADA. The parties should be proceeding under that schedule.
On September 5, 2012, Zhen-Wei Lin, on behalf of Defendant, filed a pleading entitled
22
23
“Need Extension More Time for Correction,” stating that Defendant needs “more time to correct the
24
problem.” On September 27, 2012, Defendant filed a consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction.
The parties are ordered to meet and confer regarding Defendant’s need for an extension of
25
26
time to determine how, if at all, the extension affects the scheduling order in this case. No later than
27
November 5, 2012, the parties shall file a joint statement to the Court regarding the status of this
28
case.
The Court notes that Defendant should obtain counsel to represent it in this action and that it
1
may not appear pro se. Under this Court’s Local Rules, “a corporation, unincorporated association,
2
partnership or other such entity may appear only through a member of the bar of this Court.” Civil
3
L.R. 3-9(b).
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 12, 2012
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?