Heatherly et al v. Sushi Zoo Corporation et al

Filing 8

ORDER by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte terminating 5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 DAREN HEATHERLY, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 No. C -12-03458 EDL ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S “NEED EXTENSION MORE TIME FOR CORRECTION” v. SUSHI ZOO CO., Defendant. 15 / 16 Plaintiff filed this action on July 2, 2012, alleging, among other things, denial of right of 17 18 access by a public accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 19 12101, et seq. On August 1, 2012, Plaintiff filed a consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. When 20 this case was filed, the Court issued a scheduling order for cases asserting denial of right of access 21 under the ADA. The parties should be proceeding under that schedule. On September 5, 2012, Zhen-Wei Lin, on behalf of Defendant, filed a pleading entitled 22 23 “Need Extension More Time for Correction,” stating that Defendant needs “more time to correct the 24 problem.” On September 27, 2012, Defendant filed a consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The parties are ordered to meet and confer regarding Defendant’s need for an extension of 25 26 time to determine how, if at all, the extension affects the scheduling order in this case. No later than 27 November 5, 2012, the parties shall file a joint statement to the Court regarding the status of this 28 case. The Court notes that Defendant should obtain counsel to represent it in this action and that it 1 may not appear pro se. Under this Court’s Local Rules, “a corporation, unincorporated association, 2 partnership or other such entity may appear only through a member of the bar of this Court.” Civil 3 L.R. 3-9(b). 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 12, 2012 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?