Yates v. Fairview Market, Inc. et al

Filing 12

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO PROSECUTE: Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 9/26/2013 at 11:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by 9/23/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 9/16/2013. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 Northern District of California 6 San Francisco Division 7 CRAIG YATES, No. C 12-03459 LB Plaintiff, 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO PROSECUTE v. 9 FAIRVIEW MARKET, et al., 10 Defendants. _____________________________________/ 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants on July 2, 2012. Complaint, ECF No. 1. The 13 ADA Scheduling Order required Plaintiff to complete service on Defendants by August 31, 2012. 14 Defendants Fairview Market, Inc. and Rong Xu Fang appeared in the case and consented to the 15 undersigned’s jurisdiction. See ECF Nos. 5-8. Defendant Sherwin Chew has not appeared and the 16 record does not indicate that he has been served. See generally Docket. The case was referred to 17 mediation in October 2012, but the case has since come to a standstill. See generally Docket. The 18 deadlines for this ADA case also have passed. See ADA Scheduling Order, ECF No. 2. 19 Accordingly, the court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be 20 dismissed for failure to prosecute and why Defendant Sherwin Chew should not be dismissed for 21 failure to effect service. Plaintiff SHALL do so by filing a written response no later than Monday 22 September 23, 2013. The court SETS a show cause hearing for Thursday, September 26, 2013 at 23 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San 24 Francisco, California, 94102. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: September 16, 2013 _______________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 27 28 C 12-03459 LB ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?