Tric Tools, Inc. v. TT Technologies, Inc et al

Filing 88

ORDER RE: NUMBER OF DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 24, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2014)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

TRIC TOOLS, INC.,

Case No. 12-cv-03490-JST

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER RE: NUMBER OF DISPUTED
CLAIM TERMS

9
10

TT TECHNOLOGIES, INC, et al.,
Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

In their Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement, ECF No. 74, the parties state:

13

“Although Patent L.R. 4-3 requires the parties to identify the ten most significant terms, the parties

14

respectfully request that the Court construe twelve stipulated terms.” That request is denied. The

15

parties shall submit a statement in compliance with Patent L.R. 4-3(c) by no later than January 31,

16

2014. The Court will only construe the ten claim terms the parties identify pursuant to Patent L.R.

17

4-3(c). In the absence of a statement complying with Patent L.R. 4-3(c), the Court will select and

18

construe ten of the twelve stipulated terms.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 24, 2014
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge