Tric Tools, Inc. v. TT Technologies, Inc et al

Filing 88

ORDER RE: NUMBER OF DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 24, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TRIC TOOLS, INC., Case No. 12-cv-03490-JST Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER RE: NUMBER OF DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS 9 10 TT TECHNOLOGIES, INC, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 In their Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement, ECF No. 74, the parties state: 13 “Although Patent L.R. 4-3 requires the parties to identify the ten most significant terms, the parties 14 respectfully request that the Court construe twelve stipulated terms.” That request is denied. The 15 parties shall submit a statement in compliance with Patent L.R. 4-3(c) by no later than January 31, 16 2014. The Court will only construe the ten claim terms the parties identify pursuant to Patent L.R. 17 4-3(c). In the absence of a statement complying with Patent L.R. 4-3(c), the Court will select and 18 construe ten of the twelve stipulated terms. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 24, 2014 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?