Quigg v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Comany et al

Filing 14

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 13 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

CHARLES B. PERKINS #126942
FLYNN, ROSE & PERKINS
59 North Santa Cruz Avenue, Suite Q
Los Gatos, California 95030
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff
KANDY QUIGG

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

KANDY QUIGG,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13

vs.
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY,

14
15

Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. C12 03493 MEJ
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
THEREON

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, Plaintiff,
KANDY QUIGG and Defendant, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
through their respective attorneys of record, that the above-entitled action, and all claims for
relief thereon, shall be dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
41(a), subject to the Settlement and Release Agreement entered into between the parties, with

23

neither party to make a claim for fees or costs based on the Dismissal.

24

DATE: December 27, 2012

FLYNN, ROSE & PERKINS

25
26
27

By

/s/ Charles

B. Perkins
CHARLES B. PERKINS
Attorney for Plaintiff, K. QUIGG

28
Page 1
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Case No. C12 03493 MEJ

1
2
3

SEDGWICK LLP

DATE: December 27, 2012

4
By

5

__/s/ Rebecca A. Hull
REBECCA A. HULL

Attorneys for Defendant
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

6
7
8

ORDER

9
Having reviewed the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing,

10

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice, with neither

11
12

party to make a claim for fees or costs based on this Dismissal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14
15
16

DATE:

January 2, 2013

HON. MARIA-ELENA JAMES
DIST. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Case No. C12 03493 MEJ