Quigg v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Comany et al

Filing 9

ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 8 Stipulation To Extend Time To Respond to Complaint, and Continue Initial Case Management Conference and Associated Deadines. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 FLYNN, ROSE & PERKINS CHARLES B. PERKINS (Calif. Bar #126942) 59 North Santa Cruz Avenue, Suite Q Los Gatos, California 95030 Telephone: (408) 399-4566 Facsimile: (408) 399-6683 cbperk@earthlink.net Attorneys for Plaintiff KANDY QUIGG SEDGWICK LLP REBECCA A. HULL (Calif. Bar #99802) MARK J. HANCOCK (Calif. Bar #160662) 333 Bush Street, 30th Floor San Francisco, California 94104-2834 Telephone: (415) 781-7900 Facsimile: (415) 781-2635 rebecca.hull@sedgwicklaw.com Attorneys for Defendants METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; and CITIGROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 KANDY QUIGG, CASE NO. CV 12-3493 MEJ Plaintiff, 18 19 vs. 20 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; CITIGROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, 21 Defendants. 22 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER INITIAL CMC DATE: 10/4/2012 23 Plaintiff KANDY QUIGG and Defendants METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE 24 COMPANY and CITIGROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN (“Defendants”), by and 25 through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 26 27 28 29 30 WHEREAS, this is an action to recover Long Term Disability benefits brought pursuant to 29 USC § 1132(a)(1)(b); and WHEREAS, following service of the Complaint, Defendants agreed to reinstate JOINT STIPULATION -1- CASE NO. CV 12-3493 MEJ 1 2 3 Plaintiff’s Long Term Disability benefits, and have done so; and WHEREAS, the parties are currently discussing resolution of the remaining issues of attorney’s fees, costs, and interest. 4 NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE to extend by 35 days 5 the time for Defendants to file a response to Plaintiff’s Complaint, from September 24, 2012 to 6 October 29, 2012; and 7 THE PARTIES FURTHER STIPULATE AND REQUEST that the Court continue the 8 Initial Case Management Conference from October 4, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. to November 8, 2012, 9 at 10:00 a.m. or as soon thereafter as may be convenient to the Court, and that the deadlines 10 associated with the Initial Case Management Conference be similarly continued based on the 11 rescheduled Case Management Conference date. 12 SO STIPULATED, AGREED AND RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: 13 14 DATED: September 21, 2012 FLYNN, ROSE & PERKINS 15 16 By:__/s/ Charles B. Perkins_________ Charles B. Perkins Attorneys for Plaintiff KANDY QUIGG 17 18 19 DATED: September 21, 2012 SEDGWICK LLP 20 21 By: /s/ Rebecca A. Hull Rebecca A. Hull Attorneys for Defendants METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; CITIGROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN 22 23 _ 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 JOINT STIPULATION -2- CASE NO. CV 12-3493 MEJ ORDER 1 2 Having considered the Stipulation and Request of the parties, and good cause appearing, 3 the Court hereby orders that Defendants shall have until October 29, 2012 to file a response to 4 5 Plaintiff’s Complaint, that the Initial Case Management Conference is continued from October 4, 10:00 am November 8 2012 at 10:00 a.m. to __________, 2012 at ______, and that the deadlines associated with the 6 Initial Case Management Conference are similarly continued. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 September 24 DATED: ___________, 2012 9 HON. MARIA-ELENA JAMES 10 _ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 JOINT STIPULATION -3- CASE NO. CV 12-3493 MEJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?