Johnson v. SAFECO Insurance Company of America
Filing
19
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 18 OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/31/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ANN K. JOHNSTON (SBN 145022)
ajohnston@bergerkahn.com
TED A. SMITH (SBN 159986)
tsmith@bergerkahn.com
BERGER KAHN
A Law Corporation
300 Tamal Plaza, Suite 215
Corte Madera, CA 94925
Tel: (415) 891-3321 • Fax: (415) 891-3322
Attorneys for Defendant
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
BERGER KAHN
A Law Corporation
300 Tamal Plaza, Suite 215
Corte Madera, CA 94925
11
12
LESIA JOHNSON,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY
OF AMERICA, and DOES 1-30,
16
Defendants.
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. C 12-03494 RS
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF
DISMISSAL
Date Action Filed: May 17, 2012
18
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through
20
their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with
21
prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1).
22
23
Dated: October 22, 2012.
LAW OFFICE OF ANDREW WOLFF
24
25
BY /s/ Andrew Wolff
Signature authorized 10/22/12
Andrew Wolff, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LESIA JOHNSON
26
27
28
///
1
Stipulation & Order of Dismissal
Case No. C 12-03494 RS
1
Dated: October 30, 2012.
BERGER KAHN, A Law Corporation
2
3
BY
4
5
6
/s/ Ann K. Johnston
ANN K. JOHNSTON
TED A. SMITH
Attorneys for Defendant
SAFECO INSURANCE
COMPANY OF AMERICA
7
8
9
10
BERGER KAHN
A Law Corporation
300 Tamal Plaza, Suite 215
Corte Madera, CA 94925
11
12
ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the abovecaptioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
DATED: 10/31
, 2012
15
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stipulation & Order of Dismissal
Case No. C 12-03494 RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?