Morganti v. Astrue

Filing 19

ORDER granting 18 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Granting Extension of Time to File Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Michael Astrue. Motions due by 2/28/2013.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/1/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

MELINDA L. HAAG, CSBN 132612
United States Attorney
GRACE M. KIM, SBN IL 6203390
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
DAVID LERCH, CSBN 229411
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
160 Spear St., Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

7
Attorneys for Defendant
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
13
14
15
16
17

DOUGLAS MORGANTI,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of Social Security
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
______________________________)

CASE NO. 3:12-cv-3511-CRB
STIPULATION AND ORDER
FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO FILE A
CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AND OPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

18
19
20
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval
21
of the Court, that Defendant shall have a 28-day extension of time, from January 31, 2013, until February
22
28, 2013 in which to file his Notice, Motion, and Memorandum in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary
23
Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
24
This is Defendant’s first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for
25
Summary Judgment. Defendant seeks this additional time in light of his workload which includes other
26
district court briefs, multiple non-litigation matters, and mentoring duties.
27
The parties further stipulate the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
28
Counsel apologizes to the Court for this delay.

1
2

Respectfully submitted,

3
4

Dated: January 30, 2013

By:

5

s/ *Pamela Vincent
[as e-authorized via email]
PAMELA VINCENT
Attorney for Plaintiff

6
7
8

Dated: January 30, 2013

MELINDA L. HAAG
United States Attorney

9
By:

10
11

s/ David Lerch
DAVID LERCH
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant

12
13
ORDER
14
15

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

16

Dated February 1, 2013

17

__________________________________
THE HONORABLE CHARLES BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Stip. and Proposed order for Extension, C 12-3511-CRB

2